<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic inetd problem om hp-ux 10.20 in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/inetd-problem-om-hp-ux-10-20/m-p/2471945#M775487</link>
    <description>We have hp-ux 10.20 running on HP9000/735 . After box started inetd eats as much processor power as it can. After &lt;BR /&gt;  inetd -k  &lt;BR /&gt;  inetd  &lt;BR /&gt;it runs ok. Did I miss any patch ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 07:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aleksandr Konstantinov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-12-08T07:40:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>inetd problem om hp-ux 10.20</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/inetd-problem-om-hp-ux-10-20/m-p/2471945#M775487</link>
      <description>We have hp-ux 10.20 running on HP9000/735 . After box started inetd eats as much processor power as it can. After &lt;BR /&gt;  inetd -k  &lt;BR /&gt;  inetd  &lt;BR /&gt;it runs ok. Did I miss any patch ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 07:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/inetd-problem-om-hp-ux-10-20/m-p/2471945#M775487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aleksandr Konstantinov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-08T07:40:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: inetd problem om hp-ux 10.20</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/inetd-problem-om-hp-ux-10-20/m-p/2471946#M775488</link>
      <description>Are you sure it's inetd only ...?&lt;BR /&gt;whats in your syslog.log ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I see inetd take 10-15 seconds where it pegs out the CPU at 98-99%,&lt;BR /&gt;then goes back to normal. When I executed inetd -l I got the following&lt;BR /&gt;error message:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     /usr/dt/bin/rpc.ttdbserver[1840]: rpc.ttdbserverd version (1.1)&lt;BR /&gt;     does not match the version () of the database tables. Please&lt;BR /&gt;     install an rpc.ttdbserverd version (or greater).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After enabling inetd security for the RPC service ttdbserver, why does&lt;BR /&gt;inetd grab a significant part of the CPU and log errors (inetd -l) in&lt;BR /&gt;syslog?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The tooltalk database/naming service ttdbserver relies on a special&lt;BR /&gt;undocumented inetd state called swait, which is specified in the&lt;BR /&gt;inetd.conf file.  This state is not subject to the usual HP security&lt;BR /&gt;file checks. System administrators should not place entries&lt;BR /&gt;referring to the ttdbserver service in the /var/adm/inetd.sec file&lt;BR /&gt;because they will be ignored.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this case, rebooting and starting the CDE session resulted in inetd&lt;BR /&gt;NOT grabbing CPU as before.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SR #  [5003337543/STARS/English]  inetd security for the RPC service ttdbserver,&lt;BR /&gt;inetd grabs cpu. ttdbserver release notes have been updated and&lt;BR /&gt;inetd has been fixed so as to provide no support for ttbserver&lt;BR /&gt;in inetd.sec.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd install the latest CDE patches if applicable ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 08:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/inetd-problem-om-hp-ux-10-20/m-p/2471946#M775488</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Glennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-08T08:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

