<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Oracle's old hide.c program in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825884#M778499</link>
    <description>I know it is the ugliest C -- and I won't touch on security issues.  However, it is what the DBAs use and moving them into the 21st century doesn't seem to be an option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It actually does compile -- with gcc and with the HP ANSI C compiler.  Go figure.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VAS_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-19T08:41:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825882#M778497</link>
      <description>Does anyone use the 1992 hide.c program (I think provided by Oracle at one time)?  If you do, have you used it on Integrity HP-UX 11.23?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Victoria&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825882#M778497</guid>
      <dc:creator>VAS_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-18T18:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825883#M778498</link>
      <description>It's extremely ugly C (and you will have to use the Bundled C Compiler to compile) as no development compilers will handle K&amp;amp;R syntax any more but it should work. This is really not a secure solution especially since you are essentially trying to hide from a ps -f something like username/passwd. You could always authenticate users as OS_users for sqlplus and that would be far more secure. Moreover, your ultra top secret passwords would no longer have to be kept as plaintext inside scripts.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825883#M778498</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-18T20:07:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825884#M778499</link>
      <description>I know it is the ugliest C -- and I won't touch on security issues.  However, it is what the DBAs use and moving them into the 21st century doesn't seem to be an option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It actually does compile -- with gcc and with the HP ANSI C compiler.  Go figure.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825884#M778499</guid>
      <dc:creator>VAS_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T08:41:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825885#M778500</link>
      <description>Hi Victoria:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a matter of interest, with 11.23, you can (at least) limit the default length of the command line shown by 'ps'.  The manpages note:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"The default length of the COMMAND field will be 128 (including the null terminator). This can be configured by setting DEFAULT_CMD_LINE_WIDTH=value in the /etc/default/ps file. The value of DEFAULT_CMD_LINE_WIDTH should be between 64 and 1024."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825885#M778500</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T09:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825886#M778501</link>
      <description>I love the configurable ps display, since I admin machines which run java processes with their incredibly long command lines :)  That doesn't buy me what they need in this instance, though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there an internals or kernel person reading this who knows if POSIX limits, perhaps on PATH_MAX, were enforced in 11.23 but not in 11.11?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I should probably move this question.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825886#M778501</guid>
      <dc:creator>VAS_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T09:10:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle's old hide.c program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825887#M778502</link>
      <description>You can only use the ANSI C compiler as long as it is around and I recently received notice that only aCC (which does not speak K&amp;amp;R) will be available from HP in the future. In any event, converting this code to ANSI C is trivially easy.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-s-old-hide-c-program/m-p/3825887#M778502</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T09:47:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

