<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812650#M827170</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Call oracle ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd first make sure I had my system up-to-date in patches, then let them have it, but I doubt you will find any "kind" ears.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-09-24T20:26:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812649#M827169</link>
      <description>I have oracle 7.3.4 and 8i instances running on the same machine. I am running 10.7 apps on both (server partitioned mode). The two instances have the same basic data, both cloned from production  - one I migrated to 8i from 7.3.4 last week. I noticed today that the sizes of all of the 8i processes start at 30MB (from top). The 7.3.4 processes start at 10MB. Those processes correspond to concurrent managers, which I thought were all running in the 7.3.4 tech stack. Can someone explain to me why the 8i processes are so much larger? Is there something I can do about it?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812649#M827169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Chamberlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T20:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812650#M827170</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Call oracle ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd first make sure I had my system up-to-date in patches, then let them have it, but I doubt you will find any "kind" ears.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812650#M827170</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T20:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812651#M827171</link>
      <description>Hi Dave,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've seen the same thing here.  The 8i processes are hogs, no matter which box I run on and no matter how many patches we have.  I can't explain technically why they are bigger, but I can confirm that we see the same thing.  Our DBAs told us before we upgraded that the newer version used a lot more memory, and they were right.  The libraries are much bigger too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;JP&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812651#M827171</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Poff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T20:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812652#M827172</link>
      <description>to my knowledge &lt;BR /&gt;yes&lt;BR /&gt;The oracle 8i processes use more memory than your 7.x version.&lt;BR /&gt;You can check up the installation guide for the memory requirements for the new version of Oracle.&lt;BR /&gt;I could notice in many of my system each Oracle connection takes up around 30MB of memory.&lt;BR /&gt;Probably you can reduce the same by using MTS.&lt;BR /&gt;As you are using dedicated server design each client connection will spawn a seperate dedicated process.&lt;BR /&gt;If you use MTS and define the number of server processes,you can limit the amount of memory usage.&lt;BR /&gt;I am not sure whether the 7.x version of oracle supports these parameters like dedicated processes or Multithreaded processes design.&lt;BR /&gt;You have to think about,&lt;BR /&gt;It depends upon the memory on your machine,your application,your database performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812652#M827172</guid>
      <dc:creator>T G Manikandan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-25T02:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812653#M827173</link>
      <description>Are you running on HP-UX 11 in 64bit? If so this will contribute to the larger memory footprint, since 8 is 64bit enabled and 7 is not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But as with any applications or O/S, new features and enhancements use more resources. No cause for concern....</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812653#M827173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-25T12:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why larger process sizes with 8i?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812654#M827174</link>
      <description>Thanks for the responses - according to Oracle, its normal. I just thought those processes would have been indentical to their older values. It just leaves me a little short on RAM...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/why-larger-process-sizes-with-8i/m-p/2812654#M827174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Chamberlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-25T13:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

