topic Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof in Operating System - HP-UX

HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:28:01 GMT

(Originally posted to: http://devresource.hp.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2646&tstart=0&forumID=4)

The original HP-UX gprof seems to process gmon.out file of multithreaded application in a wrong way, and GNU binutils' gprof does it in a more correct manner.

Or, HP-UX's gprof seems to create gmon.out that can be wrong. GNU gprof gives different output.

Out product is a rather complicated multithreaded application that eats a lot of CPU. We are trying to profile the application of different platforms to find out what are major time-consuming parts of it, since the application behave slightly different on different platforms (because of the OS implementations, etc).

One of the test was done on HP-UX 11.11 machine, when our application was built as 32-bit application (it may be built as a 64-bit application).

The test ran some time (~100 seconds), and the gmon.out file was generated at the end. When the gprof was run for the tested binary and the gprof.out file, there were strange results. Here it's start and the end:

---
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 0.01% of 111.62 seconds
%time cumsecs seconds calls msec/call name
19.1 21.27 21.27 _mcount
3.2 24.84 3.57 $$remU
3.0 28.23 3.38 $$divU
3.0 31.57 3.35 $$div2I
1.0 32.72 1.14 _mcleanup
0.9 33.77 1.05 $$dyncall_external
0.4 34.27 0.50 4378429 0.00 hrMalloc(unsigned long)
0.2 34.49 0.23 8756076 0.00 hrCheckMemory()
0.1 34.65 0.15 $$dyncall
0.1 34.73 0.08 532042 0.00 SmartPtr::~SmartPtr()
0.1 34.80 0.07 $$mulU
0.0 34.85 0.05 $$divoI
0.0 34.89 0.04 $$rem2U
0.0 34.91 0.02 $$bit_adrs_store
0.0 34.92 0.01 1 10.00 printMallocCountSet()
0.0 34.92 0.00 2780939 0.00 hrFree(void *)
0.0 34.92 0.00 44581182 0.00 Mutex::getOwnership()
0.0 34.92 0.00 44580989 0.00 Mutex::release()
0.0 34.92 0.00 31745415 0.00 DimManager::getArrByMode() const
... [skipped ]
0.0 34.92 0.00 1597376 0.00 _strncpy
... [skipped ]
0.0 34.92 0.00 1 0.00 Cube::writeXml(Xml *,int) const
0.0 34.92 0.00 1 0.00 xmlLoadDLL(Xml *)
---

1. The total (last) "cumsecs" row was about 1/3 of the time (N, below) that was printed in the line (with "granularity").
2. The "top" calls are very strange: $$remU, $$divU, $$div2I, ...
3. Our functions are counted, but "self seconds" are "0.00", almost always.

The same output was generated with GNU gprof from GNU binutils 2.15 that was built on HP-UX 11.00 machine, and the result differs.
The result of GNU gprof seems to be more realistic, than the original gprof's.
Here is the GNU gprof output (from the same binary application and the same gmon.out file):

---
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 0.01% of 89.22 seconds
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
% cumulative self self total
time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name
8.27 7.38 7.38 _recv_sys
7.74 14.29 6.91 _select_sys
4.33 18.15 3.86 _send_sys
3.83 21.57 3.42 regular_seq
3.74 24.91 3.34 pthread_mutex_lock
3.40 27.94 3.03 44580989 0.00 0.00 Mutex::release(void)
3.16 30.76 2.82 normal
3.10 33.53 2.77 44581182 0.00 0.00 Mutex::getOwnership(void)
2.73 35.97 2.44 pthread_mutex_unlock
1.98 37.74 1.77 __mutex_unlock_handoff_enabled
1.83 39.37 1.63 InnerLoop
1.71 40.90 1.53 532236 0.00 0.00 Worker::processStreamPoint(QueryStream *, AskedCubesInfo *, CubesBuffers *, PointToSend *, bool &)
1.52 42.26 1.36 __spin_lock
1.36 43.47 1.21 __spin_unlock
1.34 44.67 1.20 $$dyncall_external
1.18 45.72 1.05 12477282 0.00 0.00 indexToCoord__10DimManagerCFPUpi15CalculationMode
1.12 46.72 1.00 8525168 0.00 0.00 moveToSuccessor__13DirEntryArrayFPUlN21PUpb15CalculationModeUl
1.10 47.70 0.98 13586523 0.00 0.00 putIntoIndex__10DimManagerCFPUpUlT215CalculationMode
1.09 48.67 0.97 4378219 0.00 0.00 real_malloc
1.02 49.58 0.91 31745415 0.00 0.00 DimManager::getArrByMode( const(CalculationMode))
0.92 50.40 0.82 10008954 0.00 0.00 inLimits__11AbstrLimitsCFUlN21b
... [skipped ]
0.11 81.48 0.10 1597376 0.00 0.00 strncpy
... [skipped ]
0.00 89.22 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 Cube::writeXml( const(Xml *, int))
0.00 89.22 0.00 1 0.00 0.01 xmlLoadDLL(Xml *)
---

The final question is: what is wrong?
Should I install some patches? Should I compile/build differently?
Should I reconfigure something?

---

System and tools version:
what /usr/bin/ld
/usr/bin/ld:
$Revision: 92453-07 linker linker crt0.o B.11.37 040218 $
HP aC++ B3910B A.03.52 Classic Iostream Library
HP aC++ B3910B A.03.52 Language Support Library
ld_msgs.cat: $Revision: 1.85 $
92453-07 linker command s800.sgs ld PA64 B.11.43 REL 050124
what /opt/aCC/bin/aCC
/opt/aCC/bin/aCC:
HP aC++ B3910B A.03.13
HP aC++ B3910B X.03.11.10 Language Support Library
what /usr/bin/gprof
/usr/bin/gprof:
gprof.c $Date: 2003/03/03 00:46:07 $Revision: r11.11/2 PATCH_11.11 (PHCO_27848)
calls.c $Date: 2002/11/13 07:47:41 $Revision: r11.11/1 PATCH_11.11 (PHCO_27848)
printgprof.c $Date: 2002/11/13 07:48:25 $Revision: r11.11/1 PATCH_11.11 (PHCO_27848)
fixbounds.c $Date: 2003/03/03 00:46:07 $Revision: r11.11/2 PATCH_11.11 (PHCO_27848)
$Revision: @(#) all CUP11.11_BL2003_0310_3 PATCH_11.11 PHCO_27848
Mon Mar 10 21:58:20 PST 2003 $
/usr/local/bin/gprof --version
GNU gprof 2.15
Based on BSD gprof, copyright 1983 Regents of the University of California.
This program is free software. This program has absolutely no warranty.
what /usr/lib/libpthread.sl
/usr/lib/libpthread.sl:
Pthread Interfaces
$Revision: libpthread.1: @(#) depot-32pa CUP11.11_BL2002_0405_3 PATCH_11.11 PHCO_26466 Fri Apr 5 12:25:38 PST 2002 $
what /usr/lib/libc.sl
/usr/lib/libc.sl:
$ PATCH_11.11/PHCO_29955 Jan 28 2004 01:24:54 $
what /usr/lib/libp/libc.a
/usr/lib/libp/libc.a:
$ PATCH_11.11/PHCO_29955 Jan 28 2004 01:26:40 $

Patches tried: (that relate to any of the words: gprof crt0 gcrt0 _mcount
PHCO_27848 s700_800 11.11 gprof(1) patch
PHSS_30970 s700_800 11.11 ld(1) and linker tools cumulative patch
PHSS_28435 s700_800 11.11 linker startup code / SLLIC ELF support
(does not include gcrt0.o file)

Compile time options:
for release version:
aCC +z \
-DRWSTD_MULTI_THREAD -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D__STDC_EXT__ \
-D_POSIX2_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L \
-D_HPUX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED \
-D_XPG4 \
+O2 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=32 +W495 -D_REENTRANT \
-I -D \
-c -o
for profile version:
aCC +O2 \
-DRWSTD_MULTI_THREAD -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D__STDC_EXT__ \
-D_POSIX2_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L \
-D_HPUX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED \
-D_XPG4 \
-G -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=32 +W495 -D_REENTRANT \
-I -D \
-c -o
Note, that option "-G" can not go with "+z" (PIC).
May this be a problem ?

Build time options:
for release version:
aCC +O2 -o -L \
-l -ldld -lpthread -lrt -Wl,-N
for profile version:
aCC -G -o -L \
-l -ldld -lpthread -lrt -Wl,-N
where are compiled using appropriate compile options, and created with "ar(1)" command with "ranlib" afterwards.

---

swlist -l file | egrep 'gprof|crt0|libp/|bin/aCC|bin/ld'

ACXX.ACXX: /opt/aCC/bin/aCC
# Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP B.11.01.06 Family of Startup crt0.o files
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/crt0.o
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/gcrt0.o
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/icrt0.o
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/mcrt0.o
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/pa20_64/crt0.o
Auxiliary-Opt.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/scrt0.o
BLINKLINK.BLINKLINK: /opt/blinklink/obsolete/bin/ld
HPPAK.HPPAK: /opt/langtools/hppak/ui/icons/gprof_icon.pm
OS-Core.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/bin/ld
OS-Core.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/lbin/ld32
OS-Core.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/lbin/ld64
OS-Core.C-MIN: /usr/ccs/lib/crt0.o
OS-Core.C-MIN-32ALIB: /usr/lib/libp/libpthread.a
OS-Core.C-MIN-64ALIB: /usr/ccs/lib/pa20_64/crt0.o
OS-Core.C-MIN-64ALIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libp/libpthread.a
OS-Core.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/bin/ldd
OS-Core.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/lbin/ldd32
OS-Core.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/lbin/ldd64
OS-Core.CORE-64SLIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libgprof.1
OS-Core.CORE-64SLIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libgprof.a
OS-Core.CORE-64SLIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libgprof.sl
OS-Core.CORE-KRN: /usr/conf/sys/gprof.h
OS-Core.CORE-SHLIBS: /usr/lib/libgprof.1
OS-Core.CORE-SHLIBS: /usr/lib/libgprof32.sl
# PHCO_27848 1.0 gprof(1) patch.
PHCO_27848.PROG-AUX: /usr/ccs/bin/gprof
PHCO_29955.PROG-AUX: /usr/lib/libp/libc.a
PHCO_29955.PROG-AX-64ALIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libp/libc.a
PHSS_28435.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/crt0.o
PHSS_28435.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/icrt0.o
PHSS_28435.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/pa20_64/crt0.o
PHSS_28435.LANG-STARTUP: /opt/langtools/lib/scrt0.o
PHSS_30970.C-INC: /usr/include/crt0.h
PHSS_30970.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/bin/ld
PHSS_30970.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/lbin/ld32
PHSS_30970.C-KRN: /usr/ccs/lbin/ld64
PHSS_30970.C-MIN: /usr/ccs/lib/crt0.o
PHSS_30970.C-MIN-64ALIB: /usr/ccs/lib/pa20_64/crt0.o
PHSS_30970.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/bin/ldd
PHSS_30970.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/lbin/ldd32
PHSS_30970.CMDS-AUX: /usr/ccs/lbin/ldd64
ProgSupport.C-INC: /usr/include/crt0.h
ProgSupport.C-INC: /usr/include/sys/gprof.h
ProgSupport.PAUX-ENG-A-MAN: /usr/share/man/man1.Z/gprof.1
ProgSupport.PAUX-ENG-A-MAN: /usr/share/man/man3.Z/crt0.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-ENG-A-MAN: /usr/share/man/man3.Z/crt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-ENG-A-MAN: /usr/share/man/man3.Z/gcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-ENG-A-MAN: /usr/share/man/man3.Z/mcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-E-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man1.Z/gprof.1
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-E-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man3.Z/crt0.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-E-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man3.Z/crt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-E-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man3.Z/gcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-E-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.eucJP/man3.Z/mcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-S-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.SJIS/man1.Z/gprof.1
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-S-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.SJIS/man3.Z/crt0.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-S-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.SJIS/man3.Z/crt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-S-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.SJIS/man3.Z/gcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PAUX-JPN-S-MAN: /usr/share/man/ja_JP.SJIS/man3.Z/mcrt0.o.3
ProgSupport.PROG-AUX: /usr/ccs/bin/gprof
ProgSupport.PROG-AUX: /usr/lib/gprof.callg
ProgSupport.PROG-AUX: /usr/lib/gprof.flat
ProgSupport.PROG-AUX: /usr/lib/libp/libc.a
ProgSupport.PROG-AX-64ALIB: /usr/lib/pa20_64/libp/libc.a
gcc.gcc-MAN: /usr/local/man/man1/gprof.1
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/bin/gprof
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/info/gprof.info
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
gcc.gcc-RUN: /usr/local/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
Total=17:05.53 (CPU/TOTAL=1.2%, user=9.56 kernel=3.51)

--- END ---

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Amit Agarwal_1 — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:06:44 GMT

You can use 11.23.04.09 binary on 11.11 system. It should work fine.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:09:38 GMT

Two questions:
1. where do I get this binary (I have HP-UX 11.11 on PA-RISC machine) ?
2. gprof works fine for a simple applications; it does not work "fine" for something really complicated.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

rick jones — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:36:04 GMT

On HP-UX, ifyou have a complicated aplication, with threads and the like, for PA-RISC I'd probably suggest using Prospect to profile - IIRC http://www.hp.com/go/prospect.

If all the $$ stuff is what you think is wrong with the profile with HP-UX grpof, those are millicode routines for integer multiply and divide and such. PA-RISC has native integer multiple or divide and so the compiler will direct the math to millicode routines.

I do not know about the aCC compiler in this regard, but if you compile C with the HP ANSI C compiler, and tall it to produce a PA 2.0 binary with a suitable optimization level, at least some of the integer ops can be sent to the floating point unit (FPU). The compiler can do this because it can safely ass-u-me that any PA 2.0 system has an FPU. That assumption was not safe for PA 1.1 (aka +DAportable).

By default, the compiler produces code matching the CPU on which the compile takes place. So, if your's is a PA 1.1 system it would be consistent. The "file" command will tell you what flavor of binary was produced.

Of course, HP-UX gprof may still not be getting it right, in which case all the above is of only academic interest :)

If the GNU version is correct, all that time in select() suggests you may want to consider using evenports - man 7 poll on an HP-UX system.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Amit Agarwal_1 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:05:54 GMT

>>> 1. where do I get this binary (I have HP-UX 11.11 on PA-RISC machine) ?

This looks like a problem for you. You must get in touch with HP contact (Response Centre Engineer). There must be one for you(your company).

>>> 2. gprof works fine for a simple applications; it does not work "fine" for something really complicated.

the issue has nothing to do with application's complexity or size. It is incorrect timing caculation that it does. hence this problem.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

rick jones — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:51:28 GMT

typographical correction - PA-RISC has _no_ integer multiply or divide instructions

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:38:53 GMT

Amit,

Why are you so sure that a 11.23.04.09 binary will work OK on my system ?
I was sure that my HP-UX's original "gprof" works OK, too, until the moment I understood that I must suspect something.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:44:11 GMT

Rick,

I've looked at "prospect", and it definitely is not a tool I want: I want to profile not only system calls and library function, but my own code, that eats CPU time.

I know what are millicode routines, and their presence (if it's actual) does not make me suspect anything. I'm OK with them.

The main problem is: which of the two "gprof" binaries gives correct results (if any), and what am I doing wrongly?
If I can proof that HP's gprof is incorrect, how do I submit a bug report about it? Should I have a open contract to HP?

"man 7 poll" does not give my anything. I have a manual page for "poll" only in section 2.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Amit Agarwal_1 — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:19:35 GMT

Alexey,

>>Why are you so sure that a 11.23.04.09 binary will work OK on my system ?

Amit: Because I myself have fixed this problem in HP-UX gprof. And since gprof plainly reads gmon.out and binary to give the profliing output, it is version or platform independant.

>>I was sure that my HP-UX's original "gprof" works OK, too, until the moment I understood that I must suspect something.

Amit: The defect that you are seeing is one of the corner cases. You may not see it while profiling other application.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:57:50 GMT

Amit,

I've tried a gprof from a patch:
PHCO_31548 s700_800 11.23 gprof(1) cumulative patch
which had a symptom:
gprof(1) gives incorrect profiling result for PA 32-bit applications

"what PHCO_31548/PROG2-AUX.2/usr/ccs/bin/gprof" gives:
$Revision: 92453-07 linker linker crt0.o B.11.16.01 030415 $
$Revision: B11.23.0409LR

The patch seems to provide really correct gprof binary, but it can not be installed on a HP-UX 11.11 platform.

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Amit Agarwal_1 — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:32:31 GMT

Alexey,

You cannot install 11.23.0409 patch on 11.11 system. Instead you need to install the patch on 11.23 system, and then copy (remote copy) /usr/ccs/bin/gprof onto 11.11 system.

-Amit

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Amit Agarwal_1 — Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:29:20 GMT

Was curious to know, the steps I told you did they help?

Re: HP-UX gprof vs. GNU binutils' gprof

Alexey Roytman — Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:13:41 GMT

Amit,
yes, your answer was useful; the gprof binary extracted from the patch gave an output that was very close (by timings) to the GNUish output. So, I suppose that this patch provides more correct gprof, like the GNUish one.

But since I have no HP-UX 11.23 machine, the patch can not be installed for me.
Also, I have no support contract with HP, and can not ask for them to backport that patch to HP-UX 11.11.

Bottom line: I'll either use a GNU binary (for 32-bit), or the extracted file (for 32-bit and 64-bit).