https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interleaved-swapping/m-p/2556950#M887273 Hi Troyan,<BR /><BR />The interleaving is working correctly; otherwise, you would see all of one swap area used before any of the next priority is touched. What is confusing you is that the usage is not equal. You have to ask yourself, how likely is it that running processes will need to page_out on such an equal basis.<BR /><BR />Clay Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:49:41 GMT A. Clay Stephenson 2001-07-25T12:49:41Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interleaved-swapping/m-p/2556949#M887272 Hi all,<BR /><BR />I created a secondary swap volume on different physical<BR />drive with same priority like the primary swap volume:<BR />------------------------------------------------------<BR /># swapinfo -at<BR /> Kb Kb Kb PCT START/ Kb<BR />TYPE AVAIL USED FREE USED LIMIT RESERVE PRI NAME<BR />dev 1703936 155368 1548568 9% 0 - 1 /dev/vg00/lvol2<BR />dev 1703936 52164 1651772 3% 0 - 1 /dev/vg00/swap<BR />reserve - 969756 -969756<BR />total 3407872 1177288 2230584 35% - 0 -<BR />------------------------------------------------------<BR />Why is the percentage usage different? I expected<BR />"interleaved swapping" and equal numbers under<BR />"PCT USED" column!<BR /><BR />Troy.<BR /> Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:36:45 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interleaved-swapping/m-p/2556949#M887272 Troyan Krastev 2001-07-25T12:36:45Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interleaved-swapping/m-p/2556950#M887273 Hi Troyan,<BR /><BR />The interleaving is working correctly; otherwise, you would see all of one swap area used before any of the next priority is touched. What is confusing you is that the usage is not equal. You have to ask yourself, how likely is it that running processes will need to page_out on such an equal basis.<BR /><BR />Clay Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:49:41 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interleaved-swapping/m-p/2556950#M887273 A. Clay Stephenson 2001-07-25T12:49:41Z