<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834386#M89718</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of data is being read/written? Database? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually 8% max of 16GB is 1.2GB is usually rather high - but it depends again on what kind of IO you are doing. I like to keep mine under 400MB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-10-28T16:05:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Buffer hits and kernel parms</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834385#M89717</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a L2000 that we just increaded memory from 7GB to 16GB.  Accordingly I modified the kernel parms:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;dbc_min_pct=2&lt;BR /&gt;dbc_max_pct=8&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Which should give me over 1GB of memory for buffers. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However my buffer hits have dropped from near 100% to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:11 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:13     640    1921      67      11      35      69       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:15     708    1971      64       6      22      70       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:17     757    2228      66      31      32       2       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:19     639    1646      61       8      22      60       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:21     646    1427      55       9      28      68       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:23     602    1464      59      50      18       0       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:25     719    1236      42      14      55      75       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:27     730    1377      47       8       8       0       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:29     696    1582      56       9      17      46       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;09:56:31     693    2020      66      14      29      53       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Average      683    1687      60      16      27      40       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are there any other kernel parms I should look at?  Should I increase the max %?  I would think 1GB would be more than adequate.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sean</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834385#M89717</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean OB_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-28T15:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834386#M89718</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of data is being read/written? Database? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually 8% max of 16GB is 1.2GB is usually rather high - but it depends again on what kind of IO you are doing. I like to keep mine under 400MB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834386#M89718</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-28T16:05:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834387#M89719</link>
      <description>Your dynamic buffer cache could be overriden by a non-zero bufpages setting but your main problem is that your sampling period is much too short for these measurements. You need to sample over a much longer period of time and while the box is under different loads before any kind of intelligent estimate can be made as to the 'correct' values for buffer cache.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I doubt that you are going to see any real improvement over about 800-1GB in 11.11 and at most about 400-500 MB in 11.0.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834387#M89719</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-28T16:09:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buffer hits and kernel parms</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834388#M89720</link>
      <description>I've actually been sampling for quite a while at various times during the day and this is about the average that I've seen.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The I/O is for a non relational database (Unidata) going to an FC60 array.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;bufpages is set to zero.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'll sample for the entire day today and see if the results are any different.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/buffer-hits-and-kernel-parms/m-p/2834388#M89720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean OB_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-28T16:26:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

