<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: renicing processes and Oracle in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108349#M905720</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;'It depends'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you consider to start turning knobs, be sure to have a measurement in place for feedback. At least 'overall trhoughput', like the run time for a typical batch job.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also have a few specific, heavy hitting, statspack timed events in mind (for example log file sync) when you turn a know like the lgwr prio.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a first stab to playing with priority I'd recommend to add the init.ora param:&lt;BR /&gt;HPUX_SCHED_NOAGE = 178&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hein.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hein van den Heuvel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-11-04T22:05:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108345#M905716</link>
      <description>Hi! :)&lt;BR /&gt;I have heard,that renicing in HP-UX of&lt;BR /&gt;several main processes in Oracle,&lt;BR /&gt;like DBWR,LGWR,ARCH and so on...&lt;BR /&gt;could improve DB-performnce?&lt;BR /&gt;Does anybody know more about it?&lt;BR /&gt;Any experiance? Please explain me which processes could be reniced, and which not?&lt;BR /&gt;What can be the values?&lt;BR /&gt;Excuse me, if it is stupid question.. :))  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 04:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108345#M905716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inesa Clinko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-03T04:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108346#M905717</link>
      <description>Inesa &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Where did you hear that?&lt;BR /&gt;It's a new one on me, and I can't find anything on metalink, but I'm willing to be convinced.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Graham</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108346#M905717</guid>
      <dc:creator>Graham Cameron_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-03T05:32:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108347#M905718</link>
      <description>yes or no! however, renicing oracle bg processes is totally unsupported. so i wouldn't muck around them.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-&lt;BR /&gt;hth,&lt;BR /&gt;Stan</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 20:24:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108347#M905718</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stan_17</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-04T20:24:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108348#M905719</link>
      <description>Oracle is designed to work with standard process assignment.  It is best not to mess with it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can use paid add in products like PRM to tune performance and give oracle higher priority.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But: What happens if you give Oracle too much priority and there aren't enough cycles for I/O? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Answer: Not very much.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108348#M905719</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-04T21:16:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108349#M905720</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;'It depends'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you consider to start turning knobs, be sure to have a measurement in place for feedback. At least 'overall trhoughput', like the run time for a typical batch job.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also have a few specific, heavy hitting, statspack timed events in mind (for example log file sync) when you turn a know like the lgwr prio.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a first stab to playing with priority I'd recommend to add the init.ora param:&lt;BR /&gt;HPUX_SCHED_NOAGE = 178&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hein.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108349#M905720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hein van den Heuvel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-04T22:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: renicing processes and Oracle</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108350#M905721</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;priorities of Oracle processes, either system or client processes, should not be changed on OS level.  This will do more harm than good.  Let Oracle take care of itself.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Thierry.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/renicing-processes-and-oracle/m-p/3108350#M905721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry Poels_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-05T02:06:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

