<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Syscall already definied:  lwp_mutex_unlock_2 in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838342#M90622</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Dietmar said:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; The 53 was used at least by CA's&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; software "eTrust Access Control". They are&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; now using number 254 instead which is &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; officially reserverd for them. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, who do I talk to to reserve a system&lt;BR /&gt;call number?  I need one, and am willing&lt;BR /&gt;to implement it in a manner where other&lt;BR /&gt;users/vendors can share access to it&lt;BR /&gt;(i.e., so that this isn't the start of&lt;BR /&gt;hundreds of users asking for one :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, HP-UX 10.20 has 254 as SYS_ULSDEST,&lt;BR /&gt;and HP-UX 11.11 doesn't mention 254,&lt;BR /&gt;and HP-UX 11.23 doesn't mention 254.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Stan&lt;BR /&gt;sieler@allegro.com</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:43:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stan Sieler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-04T20:43:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syscall already definied:  lwp_mutex_unlock_2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838340#M90620</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After I installed some patch, the system can't boot.  The next message show:&lt;BR /&gt;sysent_assign_function: syscall already definied&lt;BR /&gt;system call # 53&lt;BR /&gt;name is "lwp_mutex_unlock_2"&lt;BR /&gt;1 argument(s)&lt;BR /&gt;32-bit call function at 0x32da30&lt;BR /&gt;32-bit dynamic function at 0x32da30&lt;BR /&gt;64-bit call function at 0x2bf180 &lt;BR /&gt;64-bit dynamic function at 0x0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when I tried to remove the bundle installed, the system shows a dependecy message dialiog, but is empty, and can't continue the uninstall.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards.&lt;BR /&gt;Marco&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2002 13:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838340#M90620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Queirolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-04T13:20:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syscall already definied:  lwp_mutex_unlock_2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838341#M90621</link>
      <description>The old syscall number 53 is being reused after installing some HP-UX kernel patches. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The 53 was used at least by CA's software "eTrust Access Control". They are now using number 254 instead which is officially reserverd for them.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe this helps: &lt;A href="http://support.ca.com/Download/patches/etrust/access_control/QO22955.html." target="_blank"&gt;http://support.ca.com/Download/patches/etrust/access_control/QO22955.html.&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards...&lt;BR /&gt; Dietmar.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838341#M90621</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dietmar Konermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-04T15:16:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syscall already definied:  lwp_mutex_unlock_2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838342#M90622</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Dietmar said:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; The 53 was used at least by CA's&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; software "eTrust Access Control". They are&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; now using number 254 instead which is &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; officially reserverd for them. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, who do I talk to to reserve a system&lt;BR /&gt;call number?  I need one, and am willing&lt;BR /&gt;to implement it in a manner where other&lt;BR /&gt;users/vendors can share access to it&lt;BR /&gt;(i.e., so that this isn't the start of&lt;BR /&gt;hundreds of users asking for one :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, HP-UX 10.20 has 254 as SYS_ULSDEST,&lt;BR /&gt;and HP-UX 11.11 doesn't mention 254,&lt;BR /&gt;and HP-UX 11.23 doesn't mention 254.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Stan&lt;BR /&gt;sieler@allegro.com</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:43:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/syscall-already-definied-lwp-mutex-unlock-2/m-p/2838342#M90622</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stan Sieler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-04T20:43:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

