<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic prmmonitor on multiple CPU system in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677265#M907221</link>
    <description>As a PRM test for 8 users I run a little CPU stress program (just an infinite while loop)on a four-way system. When I check with prmmonitor, the percentages do not seem to be OK. I run PRM  C.02.00 on HPUX 11.00. See below the output of prmmonitor and top:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;prmmonitor:&lt;BR /&gt;Wed Mar  6 17:28:51 2002    Sample:  10 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;CPU scheduler state:  Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;                                                CPU      CPU&lt;BR /&gt;PRM Group                       PRMID   Entitlement     Used&lt;BR /&gt;____________________________________________________________&lt;BR /&gt;OTHERS                              1         5.00%    0.00%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM1                                2        30.00%   15.09%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM2                                3        20.00%   15.69%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM3                                4        15.00%   13.96%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM4                                5        10.00%   14.76%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM5                                6         7.00%    8.39%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM6                                7         5.00%   14.51%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM7                                8         5.00%   14.66%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM8                                9         3.00%    2.92%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;top:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cpu states:&lt;BR /&gt;CPU   LOAD   USER   NICE    SYS   IDLE  BLOCK  SWAIT   INTR   SSYS&lt;BR /&gt; 0    5.00  99.6%   0.0%   0.4%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 1    1.02 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 2    1.02 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 3    1.04 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt;---   ----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----&lt;BR /&gt;avg   2.02  99.8%   0.0%   0.2%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Memory: 69560K (34848K) real, 70656K (41764K) virtual, 6941352K free  Page# 1/6&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU TTY        PID USERNAME PRI NI   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME %WCPU  %CPU COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt; 3 pts/td    21000 prmtest1 241 20    24K   108K run     40:00 60.80 60.69 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 1 pts/th    21003 prmtest3 241 20    24K   108K run     40:03 60.39 60.29 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tf    21008 prmtest2 241 20    24K   108K run     39:46 60.32 60.22 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tk    21006 prmtest4 241 20    24K   108K run     37:30 59.70 59.59 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 2 pts/ti    21004 prmtest7 241 20    24K   108K run     38:06 55.85 55.75 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tg    21002 prmtest6 241 20    24K   108K run     36:56 53.23 53.13 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/te    21001 prmtest5 240 20    24K   108K run     34:07 37.53 37.46 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tj    21005 prmtest8 225 20    24K   108K run     16:28 11.58 11.56 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CPUs are fully loaded and the tests worked fine on a single CPU system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What could be the problem ?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark van Hassel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-03-06T16:26:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>prmmonitor on multiple CPU system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677265#M907221</link>
      <description>As a PRM test for 8 users I run a little CPU stress program (just an infinite while loop)on a four-way system. When I check with prmmonitor, the percentages do not seem to be OK. I run PRM  C.02.00 on HPUX 11.00. See below the output of prmmonitor and top:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;prmmonitor:&lt;BR /&gt;Wed Mar  6 17:28:51 2002    Sample:  10 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;CPU scheduler state:  Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;                                                CPU      CPU&lt;BR /&gt;PRM Group                       PRMID   Entitlement     Used&lt;BR /&gt;____________________________________________________________&lt;BR /&gt;OTHERS                              1         5.00%    0.00%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM1                                2        30.00%   15.09%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM2                                3        20.00%   15.69%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM3                                4        15.00%   13.96%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM4                                5        10.00%   14.76%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM5                                6         7.00%    8.39%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM6                                7         5.00%   14.51%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM7                                8         5.00%   14.66%&lt;BR /&gt;PRM8                                9         3.00%    2.92%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;top:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cpu states:&lt;BR /&gt;CPU   LOAD   USER   NICE    SYS   IDLE  BLOCK  SWAIT   INTR   SSYS&lt;BR /&gt; 0    5.00  99.6%   0.0%   0.4%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 1    1.02 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 2    1.02 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt; 3    1.04 100.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt;---   ----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----&lt;BR /&gt;avg   2.02  99.8%   0.0%   0.2%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Memory: 69560K (34848K) real, 70656K (41764K) virtual, 6941352K free  Page# 1/6&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU TTY        PID USERNAME PRI NI   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME %WCPU  %CPU COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt; 3 pts/td    21000 prmtest1 241 20    24K   108K run     40:00 60.80 60.69 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 1 pts/th    21003 prmtest3 241 20    24K   108K run     40:03 60.39 60.29 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tf    21008 prmtest2 241 20    24K   108K run     39:46 60.32 60.22 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tk    21006 prmtest4 241 20    24K   108K run     37:30 59.70 59.59 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 2 pts/ti    21004 prmtest7 241 20    24K   108K run     38:06 55.85 55.75 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tg    21002 prmtest6 241 20    24K   108K run     36:56 53.23 53.13 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/te    21001 prmtest5 240 20    24K   108K run     34:07 37.53 37.46 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt; 0 pts/tj    21005 prmtest8 225 20    24K   108K run     16:28 11.58 11.56 cpuhog&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CPUs are fully loaded and the tests worked fine on a single CPU system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What could be the problem ?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677265#M907221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark van Hassel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-06T16:26:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prmmonitor on multiple CPU system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677266#M907222</link>
      <description>Remark: when I start one proces on a SP system it consumes 100% CPU, when I start 4 on the 4 way system they consume 400% CPU. So in my opinion it is a good test to start 8 processes as different users.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 17:14:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677266#M907222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark van Hassel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-06T17:14:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prmmonitor on multiple CPU system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677267#M907223</link>
      <description>This has nothing to do with your posting but I thought that your name sounded familiar. I work for AtosOrigin in the US.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 18:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677267#M907223</guid>
      <dc:creator>D. Jackson_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-06T18:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prmmonitor on multiple CPU system</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677268#M907224</link>
      <description>Hi Dustin,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You're right, I work for Atos Origin in the Netherlands. By the way, the PRM test is on one of the CLASS systems. :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2002 07:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/prmmonitor-on-multiple-cpu-system/m-p/2677268#M907224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark van Hassel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-07T07:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

