<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch' in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840868#M91147</link>
    <description>Thanks for all your responses...&lt;BR /&gt;especially Pete Randall.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was amazed. Mid-way through the swinstall&lt;BR /&gt;of PHCO_27141, my at jobs were launched.&lt;BR /&gt;It wasn't even finished installing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, thanks again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;James Phillips&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Phillips</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-11-08T14:04:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840863#M91142</link>
      <description>Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My 'at/batch' jobs are queueing up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A whole bunch of 'sh' processes are created with a PPID equal to cron's PID.&lt;BR /&gt;Only when these shells are killed does the job get run.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;James Phillips</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840863#M91142</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Phillips</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-07T19:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840864#M91143</link>
      <description>James,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sounds vaguely familiar.  Check this thread of mine:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x1cb03a7b3682d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x1cb03a7b3682d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think you may have the same situation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840864#M91143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-07T20:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840865#M91144</link>
      <description>Are these batch jobs by any chance using su - someuser command rather than su someuser command. I suspect that you are sourcing .profiles and some of the code therein expects an interactive environment - which you ain't. Commands like tset and tabs are the likely culprits. Your commands need to explicitly set and export variables (or source another file to do this) rather than relying upon .profiles. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That's my guess, Clay&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840865#M91144</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-07T20:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840866#M91145</link>
      <description>PHCO_24702 introduced behavior whereby cron(1M) may no&lt;BR /&gt;                                                  longer &lt;BR /&gt;                                                  execute at(1) jobs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This was fixed in PHCO_27141.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840866#M91145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-07T20:13:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840867#M91146</link>
      <description>Note also that cron will only allow a certain number of at/batch jobs to be running at any time. The default is 4 at and 2 batch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See man at and man queuedefs for more information.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840867#M91146</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Palmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-07T20:36:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840868#M91147</link>
      <description>Thanks for all your responses...&lt;BR /&gt;especially Pete Randall.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was amazed. Mid-way through the swinstall&lt;BR /&gt;of PHCO_27141, my at jobs were launched.&lt;BR /&gt;It wasn't even finished installing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, thanks again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;James Phillips&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840868#M91147</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Phillips</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T14:04:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems using 'at' and 'batch'</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840869#M91148</link>
      <description>No problem, James.  The only reason I ever found that one is because I was doing the "OK, nothing else makes sense, what changed recently?" routine and the answer came up  patches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Take care,&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/problems-using-at-and-batch/m-p/2840869#M91148</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T14:12:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

