<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mount options for Oracle filesystems in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630089#M920912</link>
    <description>We have several databases runinning on HP-UX 11.00 N-class and V-class machines. Oracle versions are 8.0.5 and 8i. We are using filesystems to hold Oracle data files (no raw disks). Filesystems are created on XP256 disk system's LUNs (some are striped, some are not). Generally the size of the filesystems are around 7GB each with VxFS version 3 (we do not have Online JFS). So, for example, we have more than 40 filesystems (mounted as /oracle01 ... /oracle40) for our main production database. My two questions are:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(1) To improve performance, what mount options shall I use?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(2) Will there be a gain in I/O performance when we move Oracle to other types of filesystems (like "Online JFS" or "Veritas Database Edition for Oracle on HP-UX") and with which options</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fedon Kadifeli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-12-12T09:55:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630089#M920912</link>
      <description>We have several databases runinning on HP-UX 11.00 N-class and V-class machines. Oracle versions are 8.0.5 and 8i. We are using filesystems to hold Oracle data files (no raw disks). Filesystems are created on XP256 disk system's LUNs (some are striped, some are not). Generally the size of the filesystems are around 7GB each with VxFS version 3 (we do not have Online JFS). So, for example, we have more than 40 filesystems (mounted as /oracle01 ... /oracle40) for our main production database. My two questions are:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(1) To improve performance, what mount options shall I use?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(2) Will there be a gain in I/O performance when we move Oracle to other types of filesystems (like "Online JFS" or "Veritas Database Edition for Oracle on HP-UX") and with which options</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630089#M920912</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fedon Kadifeli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T09:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630090#M920913</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/devresource/Docs/TechPapers/UXPerfCookBook.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/devresource/Docs/TechPapers/UXPerfCookBook.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... might help ...&lt;BR /&gt;Mount options are discussed in there (amongst other things).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Tom Geudens</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630090#M920913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom Geudens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T10:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630091#M920914</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some points to note:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) For performance, the OS filesystem block size should be the same as the Oracle block size.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) You should also use OS striping to improve performance. The stripe size should consider the db_file_multiblock_read_count.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your stripe size should be the same or a multiple of &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;db_file_multiblock_read_count x db_block_size&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3) Do not stripe the redo log filesystems as they are only sequentially written. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps. Regards.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven Sim Kok Leong&lt;BR /&gt;Brainbench MVP for Unix Admin&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.brainbench.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.brainbench.com&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:18:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630091#M920914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Sim Kok Leong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T10:18:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630092#M920915</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the tuning parameters you need/want for Oracle on vxfs are only available if you have OnlineJFS.&lt;BR /&gt;Both OnlineJFS, and certainly Veritas filesystems for Oracle will/can improve performance, but they come with a price tag.  Raw devices however are free, and produce maximum performance, but will require a little more effort on administration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;good luck,&lt;BR /&gt;Thierry.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630092#M920915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry Poels_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T10:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630093#M920916</link>
      <description>Hi &lt;BR /&gt;  one more imp things is to place index data files and table data files on the separate disks.  &lt;BR /&gt;   Use glance to find the IO activity by filesystem and try moving files from high IO disk to disk with lower IO rate.&lt;BR /&gt;  Also for mounting the filesystem you may use mincache=direct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps&lt;BR /&gt;...BPK...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630093#M920916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Praveen Bezawada</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T10:23:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mount options for Oracle filesystems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630094#M920917</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Online JFS certainly will give performance improvement. Use JFS3.3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Most of the file system mount options are related to Online JFS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Following is the link explaining different mount options for JFS file systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://us-support.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=d79c426517e3b6dc68/screen=ckiSearchResults?searchString=KBAN00000258&amp;amp;mode=id" target="_blank"&gt;http://us-support.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=d79c426517e3b6dc68/screen=ckiSearchResults?searchString=KBAN00000258&amp;amp;mode=id&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;Prashant.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/mount-options-for-oracle-filesystems/m-p/2630094#M920917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deshpande Prashant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-12T16:24:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

