<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654535#M922305</link>
    <description>Chan,&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a single-CPU machine?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Deepak Extross</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-01-29T12:16:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654534#M922304</link>
      <description>I use top command.&lt;BR /&gt;I found that a PA process (Java program) of %CPU is quite high (40% to 50%), but IDLE is about 90-99%.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is not reasonable for me since idle + PA process &amp;gt; 100 %.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But i use sar command, it is normal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have many many confusions!!!!&lt;BR /&gt;I don't understand there is a great different between sar and top.&lt;BR /&gt;Is top command making confusion to me?&lt;BR /&gt;I can't explain this happening!&lt;BR /&gt;Please help!!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654534#M922304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Watcher_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-29T08:43:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654535#M922305</link>
      <description>Chan,&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a single-CPU machine?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654535#M922305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Extross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-29T12:16:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654536#M922306</link>
      <description>No, it is dual CPU machine &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;9000/800/L1000-5X&lt;BR /&gt;HP9000L1000&lt;BR /&gt;2x550Mhz CPU&lt;BR /&gt;2GB RAM&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chan</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654536#M922306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Watcher_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-30T02:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654537#M922307</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The use of top can be confusing. There has been&lt;BR /&gt;threads posted about this very issue, and from&lt;BR /&gt;the results it was solved by the installation&lt;BR /&gt;of patches. Suggest you have a look at the latest patches for your system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Michael&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654537#M922307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Tully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-30T02:47:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654538#M922308</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found what I've been looking for. As I mentioned in my previous reply the problem was fixed with patches. In the following thread which has the same problem described, there are a number of patch suggestions. I've linked it here so you can read it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x5e28cbaac6dcd5118ff40090279cd0f9,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x5e28cbaac6dcd5118ff40090279cd0f9,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;-Michael</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654538#M922308</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Tully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-30T02:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting High CPU% in Java process</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654539#M922309</link>
      <description>I have checked the patches of the unix box.&lt;BR /&gt;it has patched those metioned patches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# PHCO_17439 1.0 top(1) cumulative patch &lt;BR /&gt;# PHCO_21892 1.0 top(1) cumulative patch &lt;BR /&gt;# PHKL_20170 1.0 Dino (GSCtoPCI) spinlock &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/interesting-high-cpu-in-java-process/m-p/2654539#M922309</guid>
      <dc:creator>Watcher_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-31T09:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

