<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: process binding in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620285#M925656</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PRM (Process Resource Manager) is the answer. But you need to buy this product &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-USA..</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uday_S_Ankolekar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-11-26T20:32:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620284#M925655</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am working on an L2000 with 4 cpu's&lt;BR /&gt;running HP-UX 11.0.  I would&lt;BR /&gt;like to run 4 processes on this machine&lt;BR /&gt;and have each of the 4 processes bound to a &lt;BR /&gt;particular cpu.  In other words:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;process 1 runs on cpu 1&lt;BR /&gt;process 2 runs on cpu 2&lt;BR /&gt;process 3 runs on cpu 3&lt;BR /&gt;process 4 runs on cpu 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How is this done?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Vicor Lee</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:29:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620284#M925655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T20:29:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620285#M925656</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PRM (Process Resource Manager) is the answer. But you need to buy this product &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-USA..</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620285#M925656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uday_S_Ankolekar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T20:32:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620286#M925657</link>
      <description>Although no command exists, if you want to do a little "c" programming, the mpctl function allows you to assign cpu's to processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;do a "man mpctl"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-- Rod Hills</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:36:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620286#M925657</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rodney Hills</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T20:36:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620287#M925658</link>
      <description>There is no straight command to bind a process to a processor. But there is a system call called mpctl to do this job. Check the man page for mpctl.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Sri</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620287#M925658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sridhar Bhaskarla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T20:36:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620288#M925659</link>
      <description>Hi Victor,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Take a look at the thread below,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://us-support.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=1844a418136193caea/screen=ckiDisplayDocument?docId=200000024626357" target="_blank"&gt;http://us-support.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=1844a418136193caea/screen=ckiDisplayDocument?docId=200000024626357&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regds&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620288#M925659</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanjay_6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T21:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620289#M925660</link>
      <description>Try mpsched and rtprio and rtsched.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:30:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620289#M925660</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-26T22:30:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620290#M925661</link>
      <description>Before you consider this, let me point out that doing this will make your application tightly bound to (dependent on?) the hardware configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;The loss of portability is arguably the reason why we dont see too many people doing this.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620290#M925661</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Extross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-27T01:45:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: process binding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620291#M925662</link>
      <description>It's also important to note that virtually no value will be seen in binding a process to a processor.  Nothing moves when a process is resumed on another processor--all RAM is accessible by all processors and for every context switch or kernel system call, the staeps required to get the process started again is identical regardles of which processor is selected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the binding is required to improve performance, be prepared to obseerve no measureable change.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2001 03:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/process-binding/m-p/2620291#M925662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Hassell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-27T03:43:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

