topic Re: dd command in Operating System - HP-UX

dd command

V. V. Ravi Kumar_1 — Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:37:36 GMT

hi all,
iam using dd command to copy some raw devices of size 500MB (not mounted file systems) on to a tape. it is finishing with in 5 min. But if i try to take the backup of raw device of same size, which is of a mounted file system, the dd command is taking a large time. i unmounted the file system and tried with raw device of that LV, still it is taking more time. is dd is slow on raw device which belongs to mounted file system? what could be the reason?
thanks in advance
ravi

Re: dd command

harry d brown jr — Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:30:34 GMT

Ravi,

Let me see if I have this right:

(1) a dd of a raw DEVICE of 500MB written to a tape took 5 min

(2) a dd of a MOUNTED filesystem took a lot longer

(3) a dd of (2)'s UNMOUNTED filesystems's LOGICAL VOLUME took even longer than (2)

------------------------------
The (1) looks good! What was "dd" writing to in the above (2) and (3) ????????????????

live free or die
harry

Re: dd command

Bill Hassell — Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:33:35 GMT

dd should always be run on the raw logical volume (/dev/vgXX/r-something). The 'r' says that this is raw data and will not go through the buffer cache. It doesn't matter if it is mounted EXCEPT:

1. the data may change during the dd process, thus rendering the copy useless or at least suspect

2. the lvol may be accessed by other processes, thus slowing down access by dd.

Re: dd command

Pete Randall — Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:34:02 GMT

ravi,

That looks right to me. I was trying to do some manual mirroring of whole disk volumes a while back and forgot (until the experts here at the forums reminded me) that I should be using raw devices. It took forever until I switched to raw.

Pete