<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: application's poor performence in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448052#M9996</link>
    <description>Use this command to find out oracle log files for deleting.&lt;BR /&gt;find / -name '*.log' -print &amp;gt; /tmp/filename&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is your swap space like, can you send a copy of swapinfo -tm?&lt;BR /&gt;Check if swapmem_on=1; nbuf =0 and bufpages=0 in kernel configuration thro SAM</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CHRIS_ANORUO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:03:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448051#M9995</link>
      <description>I have Oracle Application 10.7(database 7.3.4)running on HP-UX 10.20.&lt;BR /&gt;recently application performence have gone to bottom.any suggestion how to free up unneccessary diskspace? or any way to bring server performence upto normal level?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448051#M9995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikhil Mistry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T16:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448052#M9996</link>
      <description>Use this command to find out oracle log files for deleting.&lt;BR /&gt;find / -name '*.log' -print &amp;gt; /tmp/filename&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is your swap space like, can you send a copy of swapinfo -tm?&lt;BR /&gt;Check if swapmem_on=1; nbuf =0 and bufpages=0 in kernel configuration thro SAM</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448052#M9996</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_ANORUO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448053#M9997</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;here is outcome&lt;BR /&gt;hp-k260:/&lt;BR /&gt;#find / -name '*.log' -print &amp;gt; /tmp/filename&lt;BR /&gt; (cursor is blinking here)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when u reply please give detail info. of all command since i am not a sy.admin and not familiar with many unix commands.thanks again.&lt;BR /&gt;                    Nikhil</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448053#M9997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikhil Mistry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:14:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448054#M9998</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;  here is swapinfo -tm&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#swapinfo -tm&lt;BR /&gt;             Mb      Mb      Mb   PCT  START/      Mb&lt;BR /&gt;TYPE      AVAIL    USED    FREE  USED   LIMIT RESERVE  PRI  NAME&lt;BR /&gt;dev        1000       0    1000    0%       0       -    1  /dev/vg00/lvol2&lt;BR /&gt;reserve       -     452    -452&lt;BR /&gt;total      1000     452     548   45%       -       0    -&lt;BR /&gt;hp-k260:/                                          &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:22:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448054#M9998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikhil Mistry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:22:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448055#M9999</link>
      <description>Hi Nikhil,&lt;BR /&gt;The swap is not 100%, but if you set swapmem_on=1 you will get memory values from swapinfo -tm. What this does is to give you 75% of Physical memory as pseudo memory. What is your total Physical memory? (Use dmesg or cat /var/adm/syslog/syslog.log|grep Phy).&lt;BR /&gt;Check the output of the /tmp/filename, select the oracle log files in the /tmp/filename. You can specify that these logs be deleted with this command(find /oraclefilesystems -name '*.log' -exec rm {} \;. Pls back them up before removing them.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448055#M9999</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_ANORUO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448056#M10000</link>
      <description>NIkhil,&lt;BR /&gt;When you say 'recently', I assume that previously the performance was good.  If that is the case, what has changed.  Have you added new screens or reports.  Also find out if new tables or indexes were recently added. Also check if any talbles or indexes were moved. If so, identify which ones, and have your DBAs run an analisys on their database queries.  Performance of Oracle database is very data-dependant. If your problem is due to i/o contention (where both data and index are on the same disk, thus competing for I/O), one of these should be relocated to another disk.  It can also be, that a new application function was added that results in sequential access to a table, and it is slowing everyone down when it is in heavy use.  In that case, an Index would resolve the problem.  Talk to your DBAs.&lt;BR /&gt;If there were no changes to data or applications, and you suddenly experience extreme slow-down, check to make sure one of your Oracle disks is not dying.  For that, examine /usr/adm/syslog/syslog.log file to make sure there are no I/O errors.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448056#M10000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Irine Gibilisco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T17:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: application's poor performence</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448057#M10001</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,Hi Irene,&lt;BR /&gt;  here is the memory result please let me know what to do.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#dmesg&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sep 26 15:49&lt;BR /&gt;vuseg=2c75000&lt;BR /&gt;  inet_clts:ok  inet_cots:ok 8 ccio&lt;BR /&gt;10 ccio&lt;BR /&gt;10/0 c720&lt;BR /&gt;10/0.6 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/0.6.0 sdisk&lt;BR /&gt;10/0.7 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/0.7.0 sctl&lt;BR /&gt;10/4 bc&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/0 mux2&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/4 scsi1&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/4.5 target&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/4.5.0 tape2&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/4.6 target&lt;BR /&gt;10/4/4.6.0 tape2&lt;BR /&gt;10/8 c720&lt;BR /&gt;10/8.0 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/8.0.0 sdisk&lt;BR /&gt;10/8.7 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/8.7.0 sctl&lt;BR /&gt;10/12 bus_adapter&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/5 c720&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/5.2 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/5.2.0 sdisk&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/5.7 tgt&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/5.7.0 sctl&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/6 lan2&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/0 CentIf&lt;BR /&gt;ps2_readbyte_timeout: no byte after 500 uSec&lt;BR /&gt;ps2_readbyte_timeout: no byte after 500 uSec&lt;BR /&gt;10/12/7 ps2&lt;BR /&gt;32 processor&lt;BR /&gt;49 memory&lt;BR /&gt;Networking memory for fragment reassembly is restricted to 48222208 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;Logical volume 64, 0x3 configured as ROOT&lt;BR /&gt;Logical volume 64, 0x2 configured as SWAP&lt;BR /&gt;Logical volume 64, 0x2 configured as DUMP&lt;BR /&gt;    Swap device table:  (start &amp;amp; size given in 512-byte blocks)&lt;BR /&gt;        entry 0 - major is 64, minor is 0x2; start = 0, size = 2048000&lt;BR /&gt;    Dump device table:  (start &amp;amp; size given in 1-Kbyte blocks)&lt;BR /&gt;        entry 0 - major is 31, minor is 0x6000; start = 551775, size = 524289&lt;BR /&gt;Starting the STREAMS daemons.&lt;BR /&gt;    9245XB HP-UX (B.10.20) #1: Sun Jun  9 06:31:19 PDT 1996&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Memory Information:&lt;BR /&gt;    physical page size = 4096 bytes, logical page size = 4096 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;    Physical: 524288 Kbytes, lockable: 418256 Kbytes, available: 447188 Kbytes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    Using 1008 buffers containing 7968 Kbytes of memory.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/application-s-poor-performence/m-p/2448057#M10001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nikhil Mistry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-09-26T18:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

