<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: same disk model butt different .... in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470802#M16059</link>
    <description>You may put hardrive from the first box to the second one - probably it'll help to understand what is different.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vitaly Karasik_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-26T14:07:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>same disk model butt different ....</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470799#M16056</link>
      <description>All,&lt;BR /&gt;I have two ide disks of the same model on two server with the same hardware.  How come the udma option is different between the two. Below is an informational output from hdparm:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on system1:&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/hda:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6E510&lt;BR /&gt; Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw&amp;gt;15uSec Fixed DTR&amp;gt;10Mbs RotSpdTol&amp;gt;.5% }&lt;BR /&gt; RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4&lt;BR /&gt; BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16&lt;BR /&gt; CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360&lt;BR /&gt; IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}&lt;BR /&gt; PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4&lt;BR /&gt; DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2&lt;BR /&gt; UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5&lt;BR /&gt; AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled&lt;BR /&gt; Drive conforms to: device does not report version:  1 2 3 4 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on System2:&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/hda:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; Model=ST340016A, FwRev=3.75, SerialNo=3HS6FHB0&lt;BR /&gt; Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw&amp;gt;15uSec Fixed DTR&amp;gt;10Mbs RotSpdTol&amp;gt;.5% }&lt;BR /&gt; RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4&lt;BR /&gt; BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16&lt;BR /&gt; CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360&lt;BR /&gt; IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}&lt;BR /&gt; PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4&lt;BR /&gt; DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2&lt;BR /&gt; UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2&lt;BR /&gt; AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled&lt;BR /&gt; Drive conforms to: device does not report version:  1 2 3 4 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;any idea why system1 is capable of udma5 and system2 is not?  The reason I am asking about this is because system1 seems to have better I/O throughput compare to system2.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470799#M16056</guid>
      <dc:creator>K.C. Chan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-25T13:40:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: same disk model butt different ....</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470800#M16057</link>
      <description>I have to say that is really strange. The firmware is the same, the drives should be the same.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Two ideas come to mind:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) The manufacturer added a feature that is not controlled by firmware.&lt;BR /&gt;2) The drive was modified by bios/OS to do UDMA5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Suggestion: Bring this question to the drive manufacturer. They should explain it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Suggestion2: Monitor i/o performance with the sar tools and see if your perception of an i/o advantage is in fact a reality.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470800#M16057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-25T16:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: same disk model butt different ....</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470801#M16058</link>
      <description>Everything is the same, ie. kernel, jumpers, motherboard, cables, bios settings, hdparm versions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My gut is telling me something is different, first thing that pops into my head is cabling/jumper configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If they are indeed identical then I would call Seagate, like SEP suggested.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--Dave</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:11:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470801#M16058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Falloon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-25T18:11:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: same disk model butt different ....</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470802#M16059</link>
      <description>You may put hardrive from the first box to the second one - probably it'll help to understand what is different.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/same-disk-model-butt-different/m-p/3470802#M16059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vitaly Karasik_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-26T14:07:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

