<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526101#M17102</link>
    <description>This is possible, if the kernel versions are exakt. &lt;BR /&gt;I'd give it a try between 2.4.19-r1 and 2.4.19-r2 or something like that, but not between larger version gaps - this would almost have to imply trouble.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-24T20:19:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526095#M17096</link>
      <description>Does anybody know how to make ocfs works after a new kenrel is installed??? The fact is that I need to install a new kernel to solve some kernel panics, but after I installed I couldn't detect the ULTRIUM and the OCFS didn't start.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you want some detailed information, please let me know</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:34:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526095#M17096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-15T17:34:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526096#M17097</link>
      <description>Did Your new kernel contain stape drivers and the OCFS support / patches?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;iirc on 2.6.11 there was a kernel config option for OCFS right away.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:25:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526096#M17097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-18T10:25:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526097#M17098</link>
      <description>How could I know it? The new kernel is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kernel-smp-2.4.18-e.55.ia64.rpm and it is the U7 for RH AS 2.1 ia64</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526097#M17098</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-18T10:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526098#M17099</link>
      <description>The fact is that previously I installed a *hotfix* kernel and ocfs neither ultrium was detected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2.4.18-e.51</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526098#M17099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-18T10:39:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526099#M17100</link>
      <description>Now, actually the current version of the Linux 2.4-branch is 2.4.29, this 'hotfix' kernel is outdated for more than a year. &lt;BR /&gt;So unless there are policies at Your site or the support contract speaking against it (but I'd have a good laugh if a linux vendor didn't support You using linux), I'd highly recommend You to grab the 2.4.29 sources  and build a current kernel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;elsewise there should be modules for ocfs and the ultrium somewhere in /lib/modules, go through there carefully and compare it against what was there with the old kernel/modules set.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can add modules yourself using the source rpm.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526099#M17100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-20T02:15:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526100#M17101</link>
      <description>Could be possible to copy only those modules that weren't installed from one kernel to another?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526100#M17101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-22T11:42:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526101#M17102</link>
      <description>This is possible, if the kernel versions are exakt. &lt;BR /&gt;I'd give it a try between 2.4.19-r1 and 2.4.19-r2 or something like that, but not between larger version gaps - this would almost have to imply trouble.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526101#M17102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-24T20:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526102#M17103</link>
      <description>I have to say that ocfs was not the problem, after install the new kernel, the qla driver needs to be uninstalled and installed again in the new kernel in order to provide access to the ultrium and scsi partitions, after this the ocfs module is loaded without any problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526102#M17103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-28T12:58:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526103#M17104</link>
      <description>Glad to hear this works now.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You write install/uninstall - do You mean via modprobe or did You rebuild the modules?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;florian</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526103#M17104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-29T10:17:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526104#M17105</link>
      <description>Well today in another system it didn't work, the procedure was an rpm -e qla_driver, then installit again and the ocfs worked fine, however in another system I got this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# mount -a&lt;BR /&gt;mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda,&lt;BR /&gt;       or too many mounted file systems&lt;BR /&gt; This is the entry in /etc/fstab:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/sda                /erac01                 ocfs    _netdev         0 0&lt;BR /&gt;And some error from /var/log/messages:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[root@dev9 root]# cat  /var/log/messages | grep ocfs&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:11:35 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:11:35 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:11:35 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:12:08 dev9 kernel: ocfs: Adding dev8.interceramic.com (node 1) to clustered device (8,0)&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:12:13 dev9 kernel: ocfs: Mounting device (8,0) on dev9 (node 0)&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:20:35 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:20:35 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:20:36 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:20:36 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:21:08 dev9 kernel: (1238) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:21:08 dev9 kernel: (1238) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:21:08 dev9 kernel: (1238) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:01 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:01 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:01 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:33 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:33 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:30:33 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:32:02 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:32:02 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 20:32:02 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:08:53 dev9 ocfs: OCFS is already loaded; status succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:09:17 dev9 kernel: (4310) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:09:17 dev9 kernel: (4310) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:09:17 dev9 kernel: (4310) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:11:57 dev9 ocfs: OCFS is not loaded; status failed&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:13:24 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:13:24 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:13:24 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:14:23 dev9 kernel: (4690) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:14:23 dev9 kernel: (4690) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:14:23 dev9 kernel: (4690) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:27:11 dev9 kernel: Symbol #ocfs, value 005fc000 &lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:27:11 dev9 ocfs: OCFS is already loaded; succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:27:43 dev9 kernel: (6004) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:27:43 dev9 kernel: (6004) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:27:43 dev9 kernel: (6004) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:32:23 dev9 kernel: (7148) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:32:23 dev9 kernel: (7148) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:32:23 dev9 kernel: (7148) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:40:54 dev9 ocfs: OCFS is already loaded; status succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:41:50 dev9 kernel: (7320) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:41:50 dev9 kernel: (7320) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:41:50 dev9 kernel: (7320) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:23 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:23 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:23 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:55 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:55 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:54:55 dev9 kernel: (1240) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:57:13 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:57:13 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:57:13 dev9 kernel: (2347) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:58:58 dev9 kernel: (2410) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 79&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:58:58 dev9 kernel: (2410) ERROR: status = -12, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 223&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 21:58:58 dev9 kernel: (2410) ERROR: Error mounting volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 22:17:07 dev9 load_ocfs: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=dev9 ip_address=192.168.4.2 cs=1782 guid=617A5F73FB044F16E51F00110A31A813 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 22:17:07 dev9 load_ocfs: Using /lib/modules/2.4.18-e-smp-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 22:17:07 dev9 ocfs:  succeeded&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 22:17:39 dev9 kernel: ocfs: Adding dev8.interceramic.com (node 1) to clustered device (8,0)&lt;BR /&gt;Apr 28 22:17:44 dev9 kernel: ocfs: Mounting device (8,0) on dev9 (node 0)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;:-(</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526104#M17105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-29T10:32:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCFS under AS 2.1 on intanium</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526105#M17106</link>
      <description>Finally the last procedure was performd using oficial  RH AS U7, after that istalling qla driver with "-f" opton, everything worked fine.  Regards.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 17:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ocfs-under-as-2-1-on-intanium/m-p/3526105#M17106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roberto Espinoza Sánche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-23T17:31:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

