<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: spam control in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773078#M22923</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try CRM114: &lt;A href="http://crm114.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank"&gt;http://crm114.sourceforge.net/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's really good (very accurate).&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pau Garcia i Quiles</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-04-18T21:56:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>spam control</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773074#M22919</link>
      <description>Hi every body...can you give me all possible ways of getting spam into our netwok. Also please try to give the ways to block it by methods other than Spamassistant.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanx&lt;BR /&gt;best regards RavI&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773074#M22919</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmedidi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-18T04:20:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spam control</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773075#M22920</link>
      <description>Shalom rmedidi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;chkconfig spamassassin on&lt;BR /&gt;service spamassassin on&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are a number of ways of hardening sendmail spam protection at &lt;A href="http://www.sendmail.org" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sendmail.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773075#M22920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-18T05:03:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spam control</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773076#M22921</link>
      <description>Here is a good link about spam:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-spamf.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-spamf.html&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773076#M22921</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Ferreira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-18T08:05:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spam control</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773077#M22922</link>
      <description>I find greylisting blocks 90% of spam. &lt;BR /&gt;Greylisting works by putting the triplet&lt;BR /&gt;of sending IP, sending user, and destination&lt;BR /&gt;user on a list.  Email won't be accepted&lt;BR /&gt;from the triplet until a timeout has expired&lt;BR /&gt;(say for the first hour).  After that email &lt;BR /&gt;will be accepted if it is retried withing&lt;BR /&gt;a second timeout (say 8 hours).  Once email&lt;BR /&gt;is accepted the address remains on a white&lt;BR /&gt;list for a certain number of days after the&lt;BR /&gt;last triplet was last seen (say two months).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Proper email servers will retry and the mail should be delivered with the two timeouts.&lt;BR /&gt;Once the triplet is whitelisted there is &lt;BR /&gt;no delay.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the spam is coming from a spambot, then&lt;BR /&gt;the spambot will fail on the first attempt.&lt;BR /&gt;As they never retry you will have knocked&lt;BR /&gt;off a large (I get 90%+) of your spam.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The greylist delay also gives the various&lt;BR /&gt;spam traps time to identify the spammers&lt;BR /&gt;so you can identify them quicker. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are a number of services which run&lt;BR /&gt;spam traps publish lists of IP addresses&lt;BR /&gt;from which spam is originating.  Policies&lt;BR /&gt;vary so you will want to choose carefully.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another check is sender policy framework.&lt;BR /&gt;This is based on a DNS txt record which&lt;BR /&gt;identifies valid sending servers for a&lt;BR /&gt;domain.  Any e-mail which fails this is &lt;BR /&gt;most likely spam.  However, some spammers&lt;BR /&gt;follow correct SPF policy.  Unfortuneately&lt;BR /&gt;for them this makes them much easier to &lt;BR /&gt;track down.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773077#M22922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Thorsteinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-18T14:15:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spam control</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773078#M22923</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try CRM114: &lt;A href="http://crm114.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank"&gt;http://crm114.sourceforge.net/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's really good (very accurate).&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/spam-control/m-p/3773078#M22923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pau Garcia i Quiles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-18T21:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

