<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Internal disks and SAN detection in BL25p in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862834#M25218</link>
    <description>I have two blades which I believe to have configured exactly the same, having done them both myself in the last few days. They have 32-bit RHEL4 U3 installed with PSP 7.52 and are connected to a MSA1000 SAN via fibre channel adapters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have two questions relating to the output of fdisk:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. why is there a difference between the physical architecture of the disks in each server:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 72.8 GB, 72833679360 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 8854 cylinders&lt;BR /&gt;Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 72.8 GB, 72833679360 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;255 heads, 32 sectors/track, 17433 cylinders&lt;BR /&gt;Units = cylinders of 8160 * 512 = 4177920 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. why does one server detect partitions on the SAN, when the other doesn't? On one server I have files in /dev called sda, sda1, sda2 etc but the other only has sda and does not report it using 'fdisk -l'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Barry Lowe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-14T06:36:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Internal disks and SAN detection in BL25p</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862834#M25218</link>
      <description>I have two blades which I believe to have configured exactly the same, having done them both myself in the last few days. They have 32-bit RHEL4 U3 installed with PSP 7.52 and are connected to a MSA1000 SAN via fibre channel adapters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have two questions relating to the output of fdisk:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. why is there a difference between the physical architecture of the disks in each server:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 72.8 GB, 72833679360 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 8854 cylinders&lt;BR /&gt;Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 72.8 GB, 72833679360 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;255 heads, 32 sectors/track, 17433 cylinders&lt;BR /&gt;Units = cylinders of 8160 * 512 = 4177920 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. why does one server detect partitions on the SAN, when the other doesn't? On one server I have files in /dev called sda, sda1, sda2 etc but the other only has sda and does not report it using 'fdisk -l'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862834#M25218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Lowe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-14T06:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Internal disks and SAN detection in BL25p</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862835#M25219</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for 2nd question, have you check zonning ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jean-Yves Picard</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862835#M25219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jean-Yves Picard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-15T08:45:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Internal disks and SAN detection in BL25p</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862836#M25220</link>
      <description>Thanks for your response. I forgot to mention that the partitions were previously accessible by a 64-bit linux installation on the same two servers.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 05:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/internal-disks-and-san-detection-in-bl25p/m-p/3862836#M25220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Lowe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-18T05:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

