<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: uname info in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904119#M26141</link>
    <description>Hello Ragu-&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is a Xeon uProc,  how can I recompile the kernel for that specific uproc?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott McDade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-27T16:49:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904116#M26138</link>
      <description>Hello:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am working on porting my ANSI C based application from HPUX 11i to LINUX.  The distro of Linux I am using is RH 4 Enterprise Workstation.    I mangaged to get all my source to compile and now I am in the middle of doing some performance studies on my application and it seems to be slightly slower then on HPUX 11i.   So I started looking out on RH website and noticed they have distros for i386,  x86 and ia64.  I am not sure I installed the correct package for my uProc.   So just poking around I did the following and got the following output.   Does this look ok?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#uname –i &lt;BR /&gt;i386&lt;BR /&gt;#uname -p &lt;BR /&gt;i686&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How do I know I have installed the correct disto for my uProc type?&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904116#M26138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott McDade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T10:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904117#M26139</link>
      <description>Is your server a Xeon or an AMD Opteron/Athlon based one?  What does "cat /proc/cpuinfo" say?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can recompile your kernel for the specific proc that it  has.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904117#M26139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ragu_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T16:39:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904118#M26140</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PA-RISC was and is a more efficient architecture than Intel. PA-RISC and similar generation Intel chips prove that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is nothing wrong with a slight performance drop going to Linux. Lots of possible factors, code optimized for PA-RISC, different compilers, 64 bit processor versus 32 bit, lots of potential factors.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904118#M26140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T16:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904119#M26141</link>
      <description>Hello Ragu-&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is a Xeon uProc,  how can I recompile the kernel for that specific uproc?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904119#M26141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott McDade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T16:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904120#M26142</link>
      <description>Intel Xeons come in two varieties.  For the recent ones, you can choose the "Generic x86-64" proc type.  For the older Xeons, it is &lt;BR /&gt;"EM64T".  Please choose this option while configuring your kernel specific to your machine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;YMMV.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904120#M26142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ragu_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T20:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904121#M26143</link>
      <description>Ragu:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a process for configuring the kernel with with a new uProc?  Do I simply change the /proc/cpuinfo file or is there a specific process?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many Thanks - S</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904121#M26143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott McDade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-27T21:15:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904122#M26144</link>
      <description>Hello! You can recompile the kernel manually or via an rpm file.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The manual recompile is not easy but is the better way for have a good tuning.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The rpm is fast and easy but not accurate like the manual mode.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;see this link:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://recompile.org/" target="_blank"&gt;http://recompile.org/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope helpful!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bye!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904122#M26144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alpha977</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-28T06:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904123#M26145</link>
      <description>I won't recommend you to recompile linux kernel - in the best case you'll improve your performance in a 2-3%%, but you'll have many troubles with the future upgrades, 3rdparty modules, RH support and so on.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i386 and x86 are the same architechtures.&lt;BR /&gt;i32_64 *may* improve performance for memory-intensite applications and on server with big RAM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is your RISC server and Intel server config - CPU/RAM/disk system?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:38:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904123#M26145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vitaly Karasik_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-28T08:38:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: uname info</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904124#M26146</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Is there a process for configuring the&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; kernel with with a new uProc?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You choose the CPU details while configuring your kernel using the make config or make menuconfig scripts, inside the top-level of the source dir.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is no seperate process to do this but in Debian, this can be done elegantly by using the "kernel-package" uty.  This also helps you keep track of your kernel compile jobs.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/uname-info/m-p/3904124#M26146</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ragu_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-29T03:29:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

