<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: increases cache_mem but no effect on mem status in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065926#M29926</link>
    <description>It only specifies the upper limit (not starting value) for certain objects. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory" target="_blank"&gt;http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory&lt;/A&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ivan Ferreira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-06T05:25:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>increases cache_mem but no effect on mem status</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065924#M29924</link>
      <description>Proxy Server: Squid2.6-STABLE12&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dear Gurus,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when in squid.conf&lt;BR /&gt;cache_mem 128&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;then I check the memory status via command "free -m", and 581 MB was used.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But then/now I increased cache_mem in squid.conf, as&lt;BR /&gt;cache_mem 300&lt;BR /&gt;then&lt;BR /&gt;# squid -k reconfigure&lt;BR /&gt;But still memory status/used is almost same as it was before increasing the mem_cache in squid.conf&lt;BR /&gt;Again I check the memory status as&lt;BR /&gt;# free -m, and now the memory used is 589 only, and I think it should be atleast 581+(300-128)=753.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wana know why its only 589, instead of 753 ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Maaz&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065924#M29924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-06T00:23:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: increases cache_mem but no effect on mem status</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065925#M29925</link>
      <description>Shalom Maaz,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You increased cache_mem from 128 to 300, a net increase, if squid actually used it of 172 MB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may wish to try a full restart on squid and see if ti changes the figures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However I believe the cause of this is that when squid requested the additional memory, some of it came from the buffer cache. That figure probably reduced.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To prove a problem you need to know what process was using what before the change. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065925#M29925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-06T01:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: increases cache_mem but no effect on mem status</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065926#M29926</link>
      <description>It only specifies the upper limit (not starting value) for certain objects. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory" target="_blank"&gt;http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/increases-cache-mem-but-no-effect-on-mem-status/m-p/4065926#M29926</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Ferreira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-06T05:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

