<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5 in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263424#M33721</link>
    <description>Shalom Karthik,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think your problem is bonding is really designed for two NIC cards of the same variety.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Intel Card is more capable of bonding configuration than the broadcom.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a matter of fact I don't think the broadcom can do anything other than active-passive. Paired with an Intel card that might not even be possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now pair a couple of Intel NIC cards and you can load balance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-05T12:45:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263423#M33720</link>
      <description>Hi ALL&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a DL 380 G5 Server running RHEL 4 AS U5 2 NIC are Teamed .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have tried configuring it for Active Backup as well as Load Balaning .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The issues is i get lots of packet losss when i do a continous ping ,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) Ist NIC is Configured as Broadcom&lt;BR /&gt;2) 2Nd NIC is Configured as e1000 Driver .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;both the interface are 1000 MBps Full Duplex .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Testing &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If i bring down one interface i dont see any packet loss .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PLs let me know how can i fix this issue .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Karthik</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263423#M33720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karthikeyan.j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-05T04:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263424#M33721</link>
      <description>Shalom Karthik,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think your problem is bonding is really designed for two NIC cards of the same variety.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Intel Card is more capable of bonding configuration than the broadcom.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a matter of fact I don't think the broadcom can do anything other than active-passive. Paired with an Intel card that might not even be possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now pair a couple of Intel NIC cards and you can load balance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263424#M33721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-05T12:45:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263425#M33722</link>
      <description>From bonding.txt&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-2.  What type of cards will work with it?&lt;BR /&gt;-&lt;BR /&gt;-   Any Ethernet type cards (you can even mix cards - a Intel&lt;BR /&gt;-   EtherExpress PRO/100 and a 3com 3c905b, for example).&lt;BR /&gt;-   You can even bond together Gigabit Ethernet cards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am not discounting SEP's reply, but you may have other issues.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263425#M33722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Court Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-05T15:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263426#M33723</link>
      <description>can you post your modprobe.conf and your ifconfig-bondX/ethX files?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263426#M33723</guid>
      <dc:creator>Court Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-05T16:07:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263427#M33724</link>
      <description>Hi Steven and court &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks fr u r replies .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;my ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth2 is as follows &lt;BR /&gt;COnfig of eth0 - Broadcom NIC&lt;BR /&gt;DEVICE=eth0&lt;BR /&gt;ONBOOT=yes&lt;BR /&gt;BOOTPROTO=none&lt;BR /&gt;MASTER=bond0&lt;BR /&gt;SLAVE=yes&lt;BR /&gt;USRCTL=no&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Config of ifcfg-eth2 - Intel Pro 1000&lt;BR /&gt;DEVICE=eth2&lt;BR /&gt;ONBOOT=yes&lt;BR /&gt;BOOTPROTO=none&lt;BR /&gt;MASTER=bond0&lt;BR /&gt;SLAVE=yes&lt;BR /&gt;USRCTL=no&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Config of Bonding &lt;BR /&gt;DEVICE=bond0&lt;BR /&gt;IPADDR=XX.XX.XX.XX&lt;BR /&gt;NETMASK=255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;NETWORK=XX.XX.XX.XX&lt;BR /&gt;BROADCAST=XX.XX.XX.XX&lt;BR /&gt;ONBOOT=yes&lt;BR /&gt;BOOTPROTO=none&lt;BR /&gt;USERCTL=no&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Config of modprobe.conf&lt;BR /&gt;alias eth0 bnx2&lt;BR /&gt;alias eth1 bnx2&lt;BR /&gt;alias eth2 e1000&lt;BR /&gt;alias eth3 e1000&lt;BR /&gt;alias bond0 bonding &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I noticed a strange behaviour when we start the applications like tibco &lt;BR /&gt;We notice lots of packet loss&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263427#M33724</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karthikeyan.j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-06T04:56:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263428#M33725</link>
      <description>From what I saw, everything looks good. I would probably add this line to modprobe.conf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By default miimon is 0 so it is off. miimon is used to verify that the nic's are active. This might not fix your issue, but you might consider the change. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; If i bring down one interface i dont see any packet loss .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you do this are you trying it with each nic, or just one? Have you tried changing cables?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263428#M33725</guid>
      <dc:creator>Court Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-08T12:23:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonding issues with RHEL 4 AS U5</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263429#M33726</link>
      <description>From what I saw, everything looks good. I would probably add this line to modprobe.conf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By default miimon is 0 so it is off. miimon is used to verify that the nic's are active. This might not fix your issue, but you might consider the change. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; If i bring down one interface i dont see any packet loss .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you do this are you trying it with each nic, or just one? Have you tried changing cables?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for u reply &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had tried with bringing down one interface at a time and checked .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There was not packet loss &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So now i tried with active backup instead of round robin  &lt;BR /&gt;options mode=1 miimon=100 and the issues seems to be fixed now &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Karthik&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/bonding-issues-with-rhel-4-as-u5/m-p/4263429#M33726</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karthikeyan.j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-08T13:25:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

