<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Different Redhat version in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/different-redhat-version/m-p/4370472#M35442</link>
    <description>I found Redhat have many version but I am not understand what is its difference ,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. AS vs ES , what is its difference ? as I know , the difference of these two version is only AS have technical support while ES don't have , if so , what is the difference of the disc ? which one should I use ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. for ia64 , for IBM power , for intel itanium , 32bit x86 , does it mean I must find the disc to install to the right server model eg , if I use itanium cpu , I must use RH for intel itanium , if I use IBM power server , I must use RH for IBM power etc ? I tried to to use the verion 32bit x86 to install different servers , it works and without problem , does it mean 32bit x86 is work for any type of server ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. Beta , Extras Beta , I found these type of version , is it only used to testing ? if I used for production server , I can skip to it ?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>heaman1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-03T11:22:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different Redhat version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/different-redhat-version/m-p/4370472#M35442</link>
      <description>I found Redhat have many version but I am not understand what is its difference ,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. AS vs ES , what is its difference ? as I know , the difference of these two version is only AS have technical support while ES don't have , if so , what is the difference of the disc ? which one should I use ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. for ia64 , for IBM power , for intel itanium , 32bit x86 , does it mean I must find the disc to install to the right server model eg , if I use itanium cpu , I must use RH for intel itanium , if I use IBM power server , I must use RH for IBM power etc ? I tried to to use the verion 32bit x86 to install different servers , it works and without problem , does it mean 32bit x86 is work for any type of server ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. Beta , Extras Beta , I found these type of version , is it only used to testing ? if I used for production server , I can skip to it ?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/different-redhat-version/m-p/4370472#M35442</guid>
      <dc:creator>heaman1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-03T11:22:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Redhat version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/different-redhat-version/m-p/4370473#M35443</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. As supports more processors. Not many other differences. Support is a bit more expensive per system than ES. I go with CentOS which is based on AS, unless Red Hat is required. Then I go with ES unless AS is required by an application.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. ia64=64 bit itanium processor, special release of Red Hat for this processor type. Same thing for Power.  x86 is 32 bit intel x_64 is 64 bit intel, NOT Itanium.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. Extra software, may not be as well tested. I would not use any software from either of these areas in production.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:07:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/different-redhat-version/m-p/4370473#M35443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-03T12:07:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

