<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084408#M49277</link>
    <description>3, recommended Filesystem for mailbox volume(ext3, reiserfs, or xfs)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4, recommend me the best RAID-Level and filesystem for the user's home directory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;5, If /boot is created on a separate volume, then recommend me the best FS(ext3, reiserfs, or xfs)</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-15T17:07:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084407#M49276</link>
      <description>Machine: Proliant ML 350 G5 having 3 SATA Hard Drives with Hardware RAID 5.&lt;BR /&gt;Organization Type: Small/mid range(having 50-100 users)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1, for a small/midrange enterprise, is it better to install the OS(Linux/Windows) on a hware RAID5 volume, instead of hardware RAID1 ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;suggest/recommend.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2, this machine will serve as a mail server(Postfix), so recommend me the best RAID-Level for the&lt;BR /&gt;a, Linux OS volume&lt;BR /&gt;b, user's mailbox volume&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sharing my own plan&lt;BR /&gt;Linux OS "/" (hware RAID-1): /dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1&lt;BR /&gt;user's mailboxes /var/spool/mail (hware RAID-1): /dev/sdc1, /dev/sdd1&lt;BR /&gt;i.e I will add one more hdd(total 4), destroy the default hw RAID-5 volume, and configure two hware RAID-1 volumes, one for the OS and the other one for the user's mailboxes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Suggest/recommend&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think RAID-5 is not good becuase Its slow in writing(comparitively to RAID-1), and its also not recoverable if more than 2 disks fails simultaneously ... am i right ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;suggest/recommend please.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084407#M49276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-15T16:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084408#M49277</link>
      <description>3, recommended Filesystem for mailbox volume(ext3, reiserfs, or xfs)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4, recommend me the best RAID-Level and filesystem for the user's home directory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;5, If /boot is created on a separate volume, then recommend me the best FS(ext3, reiserfs, or xfs)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084408#M49277</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-15T17:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084409#M49278</link>
      <description>Here is how our stanadard setup&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hardware raid(raid 5) with three or more disks ; the logical drive vsisble from OS is /dev/sda&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the first partition sda1 is /boot&lt;BR /&gt;sda2 partition belongs to vg00 hold other OS file systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;similarly you may keep the mail data as one LV on vg00.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As far as the reduntancy is concerend, in raid 5 one disk act as parity. So our data is safe with disk failure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With raid1 (conisdering 4 disks) you can sustain 2 disk failures; But the effetctive space you get with raid1 is 50%.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084409#M49278</guid>
      <dc:creator>skt_skt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-15T19:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084410#M49279</link>
      <description>Thanks Santhosh Kumar Theyyan for help&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If i add 2(total 5 hdd) more hard drives, destroy the default raid-5, and then installed the Linux OS on raid-1 volume that consist upon sda, sdb, and sdc(here sdc is spare).&lt;BR /&gt;Likewise create another raid-1 volume that consist upon sdd, sde, and sdf(here sdf is spare).&lt;BR /&gt;And configure the swap on a traditional volume e.g on sdg.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;what you guys suggest, as I need both the fault-tolerance/redundancy as well as Read/Write speed too. will the above plan gives me the best of both(redundancy/fault-tolerance and Speed).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am very soon going to Install a server, and by asking I am preparing the best procedure for my enterprise.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084410#M49279</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-16T17:25:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084411#M49280</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Raid 1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;More reliable. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Faster, especially in a heavy write environment, which an email server may be. You point out the flaws in RAID 5 very nicely.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;More than likely if you lose two disks your raid 5 system is dead. Depends how many disks are in the RAID group.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084411#M49280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T09:19:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084412#M49281</link>
      <description>I recommend to use the all 04 disks together, using them in RAID 1+0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you use this type of array, you'll have 04 disks working in WR+RW. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Using all of them together, just split your /, /var and other mount points, among partitions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, u'll have fault tolerance with this arrange and even if you have a fault, won't impact in your environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best luck&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084412#M49281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venilton Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T11:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084413#M49282</link>
      <description>Dear Venilton de Carvalho Jr&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;I recommend to use the all 04 disks together, using them in RAID 1+0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I thinks RAID 1+0 means a non-physical raid 0(stripe volume)that consist upon atleast two   RAID 1 volumes.. isn't ?.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;you mean I should create two raid-1 volumes&lt;BR /&gt;1st raid-1 volume: sda, sdb&lt;BR /&gt;2nd raid-1 volume: sdc, sdd&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;then create a raid-0 volume that consist the two raid-1 volumes .. isn't ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did the ML 350 G5 RAID Controller Software, provides the feature of creating RAID 1+0, or I have to create two raid-1 volumes, using ML 350 RAID Controller program, and then during Installation of the OS, create a Software RAID-0 that uses the two hware raid-1 volumes ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;just split your /, /var and other mount points, among partitions.&lt;BR /&gt;Did you mean that on a RAID 1+0, I create two partition one for Linux OS(/) and the other one for user's mailboxes(/var/spool/mail) ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Maaz</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084413#M49282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T13:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084414#M49283</link>
      <description>Maaz,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You said that you have SATA drives. I don't remember if ML350's sata controller can do 1+0. I'm sure that for SCSI and SAS the controllers can do it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But explaining about RAID 1+0. I'll take the example of SAS disks. If you have four disks of 146 GB, you have a logical volume of 292 GB with fault-tolerance. Resuming, u'll have mirroring+stripping.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;just split your /, /var and other mount points, among partitions.&lt;BR /&gt;Did you mean that on a RAID 1+0, I create two partition one for Linux OS(/) and the other one for user's mailboxes(/var/spool/mail) ?&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, you can put all together, to use all performance of your disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another way to do it, is like you said, two volumes of RAID 1 and do stripping in your OS with LVM. But I would recommend to do RAID 1+0 if posible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best luck&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084414#M49283</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venilton Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T13:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084415#M49284</link>
      <description>Thanks Venilton de Carvalho Jr.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No problem I can order SAS drives too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ok suppose I have the 4 SAS drives, then using ML 350 RAID utility, first I'll create two RAID-1 volumes as:&lt;BR /&gt;1st raid-1 volume: sda, sdb &lt;BR /&gt;2nd raid-1 volume: sdc, sdd &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;then using the ML 350 RAID utility create a raid-0 volume that consist the two(1st + 2nd) raid-1 volumes .. isn't ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:41:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084415#M49284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T19:41:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084416#M49285</link>
      <description>No.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the ORCA, you can select all of your four drives and do a RAID 1+0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As an example: If you have 4 x 146 GB SAS Disks, you'll have an array of four disks in RAID 1+0 and a logical volume with 292 GB of total.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In your gonna install Linux, you'll see this 292 GB as a single disk. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this space, you can have your swap partition, / and your mailbox location.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this configuration you can have the troughput of four disks working together, also with performance of RAID1 and RAID0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here you can find more information about RAID ADG, 1+0 and 5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, check the attach file for further information.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084416#M49285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venilton Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-17T19:55:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084417#M49286</link>
      <description>Thanks, Nice help ;)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084417#M49286</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T06:15:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084418#M49287</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a mailserver could be lots of small read/writes, I would avoid using SATA drives.  They are not really designed for that sort of workload.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You'd be better using SAS or SCSI drives.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084418#M49287</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T11:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084419#M49288</link>
      <description>Glad that helped you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just remember to close the thread as you have sufficient information.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards and luck</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084419#M49288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venilton Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T20:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML 350 G5 - hware RAID Planning for a Mail Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084420#M49289</link>
      <description>closed</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:45:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml-350-g5-hware-raid-planning-for-a-mail-server/m-p/5084420#M49289</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T10:45:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

