<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks? in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102053#M49595</link>
    <description>You'd probably want PowerPath if you had an EMC. You can also use qlogic's SanSurfer for some additional load balancing options with the qlogic driver. HP's SecurePath, however, was pretty much a dead product the last time I looked - HP had no plans to support 2.6 kernels and said to use the qlogic failover driver (they had an HP-certified package).</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Heironimus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-10T18:23:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102049#M49591</link>
      <description>Good morning,&lt;BR /&gt;is there any way to reach failover funcionality using Linux RHEL5 lvm with a couple of paths to one XP1024 LUN?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some info:&lt;BR /&gt;[root@svl06 ~]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi &lt;BR /&gt;Attached devices:&lt;BR /&gt;Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00&lt;BR /&gt;  Vendor: HP       Model: OPEN-E*15        Rev: 2114&lt;BR /&gt;  Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI SCSI revision: 02&lt;BR /&gt;Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00&lt;BR /&gt;  Vendor: HP       Model: OPEN-E*15        Rev: 2114&lt;BR /&gt;  Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI SCSI revision: 02&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These corresponds to /dev/sdb and /dev/sdd devices. I've checked them (same LUN, just different path using SANsurfer from Qlogic)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have one VG using one of the PVs:&lt;BR /&gt;  --- Physical volumes ---&lt;BR /&gt;  PV Name               /dev/sdb1     &lt;BR /&gt;  PV UUID               zytcmV-fa9l-tsKi-FVCF-2MXV-ektu-r7t2a1&lt;BR /&gt;  PV Status             allocatable&lt;BR /&gt;  Total PE / Free PE    52097 / 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is that we can't add the second PVLink, as we normally do in HPUX, to the VG:&lt;BR /&gt;[root@svl06 ~]# vgextend vg02 /dev/sdd1&lt;BR /&gt;  /dev/sdd1 not identified as an existing physical volume&lt;BR /&gt;  Unable to add physical volume '/dev/sdd1' to volume group 'vg02'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any comment is really welcomed!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102049#M49591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kermes78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T10:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102050#M49592</link>
      <description>pvlinks is an HP-UX thing. These days the two standard methods for doing it on Linux with qlogic cards are the qlogic driver's built-in failover and the dm-multipath generic multipath driver. I think qlogic and the Linux distributions are pushing toward dm-multipath as the standard solution, but qlogic failover has been around longer (Red Hat only added dm-multipath in RHEL4u2).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102050#M49592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heironimus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T17:58:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102051#M49593</link>
      <description>Thanks for your answer!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will try to use one of that methods... qla2xxx or dm-multipath.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102051#M49593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kermes78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-09T05:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102052#M49594</link>
      <description>other option would be power path/secure path which ever is applicable. We use PP with EMC storages.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102052#M49594</guid>
      <dc:creator>skt_skt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-10T10:36:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux - XP1024 - Failover using LVM PVLinks?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102053#M49595</link>
      <description>You'd probably want PowerPath if you had an EMC. You can also use qlogic's SanSurfer for some additional load balancing options with the qlogic driver. HP's SecurePath, however, was pretty much a dead product the last time I looked - HP had no plans to support 2.6 kernels and said to use the qlogic failover driver (they had an HP-certified package).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-xp1024-failover-using-lvm-pvlinks/m-p/5102053#M49595</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heironimus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-10T18:23:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

