<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: swap device on Linux in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238940#M52104</link>
    <description>I have a different thinking .... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I never seen any linux box which  using 20%  or 40% swap  .... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it will always seen 0% used ... eventhough 98% physcical memory has been used... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; So i won't think  there wen't be a considerable performance issue in linux box ... if  you  do this change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i support,You should go for a try, if the mentioned system is a test server &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gudluck&lt;BR /&gt;Prasanth</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 08:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Prasanth V Aravind</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-10T08:32:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238937#M52101</link>
      <description>In Red Hat Linux, is there any restriction of primary swap space to certain type? or can primary swap space be a file system and this file system is the only swap space on the system?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238937#M52101</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Guster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-07T15:33:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238938#M52102</link>
      <description>For performance reasons, you should avoid swap on file system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 21:06:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238938#M52102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Ferreira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-07T21:06:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238939#M52103</link>
      <description>For performance reasons, the preferable situation is to have enough RAM so that the system will never have to page out non-negligible amounts of data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But to answer the original question: yes, it is possible, however your system performance will be even worse than with a swap partition if the swap is actually needed in any significant sense.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can even run a Linux system with no swap at all. But if you simply disable swap and then run out of actual physical RAM, your processes will be immediately subjected to the kernel's Out-Of-Memory Killer routine. (It tries to find the biggest memory hog and kills that process. The results are often effective, but not pretty at all.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need to run without swap, you should examine the values of the vm.overcommit_memory and vm.overcommit_ratio sysctls and adjust them to suit your situation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://opsmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/01/linux-memory-overcommit.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://opsmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/01/linux-memory-overcommit.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MK</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 04:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238939#M52103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-08T04:45:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238940#M52104</link>
      <description>I have a different thinking .... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I never seen any linux box which  using 20%  or 40% swap  .... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it will always seen 0% used ... eventhough 98% physcical memory has been used... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; So i won't think  there wen't be a considerable performance issue in linux box ... if  you  do this change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i support,You should go for a try, if the mentioned system is a test server &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gudluck&lt;BR /&gt;Prasanth</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 08:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238940#M52104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prasanth V Aravind</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T08:32:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238941#M52105</link>
      <description>in conclusion there is no restriction of the type of device as swap space.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238941#M52105</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Guster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T15:13:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: swap device on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238942#M52106</link>
      <description>@prasand - wow, you must have some underutilized servers at your disposal, you might want to consider to consolidate them...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/swap-device-on-linux/m-p/5238942#M52106</guid>
      <dc:creator>dirk dierickx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-14T07:56:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

