<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kernel Tuning w.r.t semaphores &amp;amp; shared memory in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009453#M5372</link>
    <description>To be honest, it looks like your configuration is like a lot of those with Oracle - quite complex!!&lt;BR /&gt;With such specifics, I would ask Oracle for their views on what your parameters should be.&lt;BR /&gt;I have some servers here that have been tuned similarly but it too is a very specific environment which may not truely represent yours.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck, (sorry, perhaps not the informative response you might have hoped for).</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mike Brown_3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-06-30T12:02:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kernel Tuning w.r.t semaphores &amp; shared memory</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009452#M5371</link>
      <description>Hi Guys,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;System : - N-Class, hpux 11.00&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have approx. 15 db instances running on a N-Class server , all are with different versions eg. 8.1.7-32bit, 8.1.6-64bit, 9.2.0.2-32 , 9.2.0.2-64 , Yesterday we had have a serious problem where we have to brought down one database . After "shutdown abort" db was not going down and kill -9 was also not working for any of the oracle processes. I tried killing the semaphores &amp;amp; memory regions related to the particular instance with ipcrm but no luck. Atlast we have to reboot the server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now the question is why might this problem have aroused? Can we do any kernel tuning to take care it , to avoid this in future. Some of teh parameters which are of interest are &lt;BR /&gt;root@tbau01:&amp;gt;kmtune | grep -i shm&lt;BR /&gt;shmmax               2 GB&lt;BR /&gt;shmmni               512&lt;BR /&gt;shmseg               32&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can I tune this and to which extent , if yes. I am thinking to double the values of shmmax, shmmni, shmseg, Pl advise.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanx&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009452#M5371</guid>
      <dc:creator>SSP_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-27T04:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel Tuning w.r.t semaphores &amp; shared memory</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009453#M5372</link>
      <description>To be honest, it looks like your configuration is like a lot of those with Oracle - quite complex!!&lt;BR /&gt;With such specifics, I would ask Oracle for their views on what your parameters should be.&lt;BR /&gt;I have some servers here that have been tuned similarly but it too is a very specific environment which may not truely represent yours.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck, (sorry, perhaps not the informative response you might have hoped for).</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009453#M5372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Brown_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-30T12:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel Tuning w.r.t semaphores &amp; shared memory</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009454#M5373</link>
      <description>Few things to consider&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;shmmax will ignore settings greater than 25% of totoal memory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Total memory is defined as physical memory plus swap.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Swap in general for systems with less than 16 GB of ram should be between 1.5 and 2 times physical memory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;shmseg might be a little low, but you need to collect some performance data to see if that is the issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To that end, I'm attaching a script.  I also have some information from one of HP's prime oracle tuners and may want to collect additional data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Script is attached....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With so many versions of Oracle running on the server, you may have a combination that Oracle never tested.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a long term goal, I would suggest trying to migrate to all instances running in one central version in the 8 series, say 8.1.7.4.0 and one common version in the 9 series.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This could be an oracle problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;itrc is giving me trouble accessing mhy Oracle Tuning documentation.  I'll get back to you with it when itrc lets me get back to you with it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/kernel-tuning-w-r-t-semaphores-amp-shared-memory/m-p/3009454#M5373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-30T13:43:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

