<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899909#M54013</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Read the example configuration files and other documentation available in /usr/share/doc/multipath-tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_alua for RHEL/CentOS implies that the storage system is of active/passive type and is expected to use the ALUA standard for identifying the active storage paths. So you should use the equivalent setting, which is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;prio "alua"&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-15T21:35:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5730001#M53788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a P6300 ,it link to centos5.6 via san switch.Each controller has one fc cable link to san switch , and server has two fc cables linke to san switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i type multipath -ll, display as blow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;[root@hp1 device]# multipath -ll
mpath2 (36001438009b01ddb0000900000490000) dm-0 HP,HSV340
[size=15G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=100][enabled]
 \_ 1:0:1:1 sdc 8:32  [active][ready]
 \_ 2:0:1:1 sde 8:64  [active][ready]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=20][enabled]
 \_ 1:0:0:1 sdb 8:16  [active][ready]
 \_ 2:0:0:1 sdd 8:48  [active][ready]&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;It`s seem like one controller is primary and another one is secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The /etc/multipath.conf as blow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;devices  {
        device {
                vendor                  "HP"
                product                 "HSV2[01]0|HSV3[046]0|HSV4[05]0"
                path_grouping_policy    group_by_prio
                getuid_callout          "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"
                prio_callout            "/sbin/mpath_prio_alua /dev/%n"
                path_selector           "round-robin 0"
                path_checker            readsector0
                hardware_handler        "0"
                failback                immediate
                rr_weight               uniform
                rr_min_io               100
                no_path_retry           2
        }
}&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In test, we have a problem. When i pull out primary controller fc cable, I/O needs to wait about 47s, then I/O will move to another&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;link. The waiting time is too log for oracle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guys, is there any way to made waiting time be short?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5730001#M53788</guid>
      <dc:creator>mukglion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-19T07:09:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5731017#M53792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The HP recommended settings for EVA4x00/EVA6x00/EVA8x00/P6300/P6500 are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;device {&lt;BR /&gt;vendor “HP”&lt;BR /&gt;product "HSV2[01]0|HSV3[046]0|HSV4[05]0"&lt;BR /&gt;path_grouping_policy group_by_prio&lt;BR /&gt;getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"&lt;BR /&gt;prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_alua /dev/%n"&lt;BR /&gt;path_selector "round-robin 0"&lt;BR /&gt;path_checker tur&lt;BR /&gt;hardware_handler "0"&lt;BR /&gt;failback immediate&lt;BR /&gt;rr_weight uniform&lt;BR /&gt;rr_min_io 100&lt;BR /&gt;no_path_retry 18&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try matching those settings first and if you still have a problem I would look at your Oracle io timeout options.&amp;nbsp; You may need to tune the database too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.usit.uio.no/om/tjenestegrupper/storage/tredjeparts-dok/hp-dm-mpath-reference.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Multipath for HP Storage Disk&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5731017#M53792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Grabowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-19T19:02:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5731449#M53795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I will try it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, ken&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 04:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5731449#M53795</guid>
      <dc:creator>mukglion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-20T04:31:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5898165#M54005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Debian squeeze multipath-tool does not ship /sbin/scsi_id nor /sbin/mpath_prio_alua.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know what should be replacing these callouts ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"
prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_alua /dev/%n"&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5898165#M54005</guid>
      <dc:creator>fssdc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-13T10:52:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899069#M54008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to packages.debian.org, the scsi_id is located in /lib/udev/scsi_id, in package udev. It is probably used for other things besides multipath disk identification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mpath_prio_alua does not seem to exist in Debian at all. Instead, the multipath-tools package contains /lib/multipath/libprioalua.so, which probably serves much the same purpose as RedHat/Centos 5.x /sbin/mpath_prio_alua, but in the form of a shared library instead of an independent binary.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899069#M54008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T09:06:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899151#M54009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I guess I should left out "prio_callout", right ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899151#M54009</guid>
      <dc:creator>fssdc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T09:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P6300 link to centos5.6 with multipath</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899909#M54013</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Read the example configuration files and other documentation available in /usr/share/doc/multipath-tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_alua for RHEL/CentOS implies that the storage system is of active/passive type and is expected to use the ALUA standard for identifying the active storage paths. So you should use the equivalent setting, which is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;prio "alua"&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/p6300-link-to-centos5-6-with-multipath/m-p/5899909#M54013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-15T21:35:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

