<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ICE Linux with 3020 switches in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257881#M55669</link>
    <description>Hello Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will be investigating this issue next and will update this posting when that investigation is complete.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;-Chris</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Grandinetti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-28T15:04:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ICE Linux with 3020 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257880#M55668</link>
      <description>The ICE monitoring of c-Blade 3020 switches has an issue. The switch_poller script thinks that the switch has &amp;gt;10000 ports. With the result that the RRD data becomes too big when multiple enclosures are monitored.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hacking the switch_poller script and adding the following lines to fix the port numbers for 3020 siwtches seems to work:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; $portnum = $portnum - 10476 if ( $portnum &amp;gt; 10500);&lt;BR /&gt;            $portnum = $portnum - 10100 if ( $portnum &amp;gt; 10100);&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Below is an snapshot of the snmpwalk of the switch:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;node# snmpwalk -v1 -c public x.x.x.x ifType&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: propVirtual(53)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.27 = INTEGER: propVirtual(53)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.29 = INTEGER: propVirtual(53)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10101 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10102 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10103 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10104 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10105 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10106 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10107 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10108 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10109 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10110 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10111 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10112 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10113 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10114 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10115 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10116 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10117 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10118 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10119 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10120 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10121 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10122 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10123 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10124 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10501 = INTEGER: other(1)&lt;BR /&gt;IF-MIB::ifType.10502 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hopefully this can be fixed in the next release.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter Vreman&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257880#M55668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Vreman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-26T09:55:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICE Linux with 3020 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257881#M55669</link>
      <description>Hello Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will be investigating this issue next and will update this posting when that investigation is complete.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;-Chris</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257881#M55669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Grandinetti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-28T15:04:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICE Linux with 3020 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257882#M55670</link>
      <description>Hi Peter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I just wanted to let you know this issue was addressed in ICE-Linux 2.10 development. Your suggestion was helpful too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;-jay</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ice-linux-with-3020-switches/m-p/4257882#M55670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay Greguske</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-20T20:47:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

