<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic timely updates in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/timely-updates/m-p/4302801#M55705</link>
    <description>HP looks like a spade moving in a one-way direction, when will it contribute in a sustained way to the Debian and GNU projects?  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP has done much good towards free software but it has to do more like IBM or maybe surpass it.  Its in-house software development teams should take up major bug fixing when a *new* release from testing is frozen and is imminent.&lt;BR /&gt;It is seen as doodling!</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ragu_3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-08T06:49:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>timely updates</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/timely-updates/m-p/4302801#M55705</link>
      <description>HP looks like a spade moving in a one-way direction, when will it contribute in a sustained way to the Debian and GNU projects?  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP has done much good towards free software but it has to do more like IBM or maybe surpass it.  Its in-house software development teams should take up major bug fixing when a *new* release from testing is frozen and is imminent.&lt;BR /&gt;It is seen as doodling!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/timely-updates/m-p/4302801#M55705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ragu_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-08T06:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

