<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to avoid side effect between critical and non critical services in a package ? in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024454#M57568</link>
    <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Configure them in three independent packages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-21T13:30:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to avoid side effect between critical and non critical services in a package ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024453#M57567</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have defined a package hosting 2 services : SERVICE[0] which is critical, and SERVICE[1]which is not. I have defined SERVICE_RESTART[0]="", and SERVICE_RESTART[1]="-r 3". The problem here is that when SERVICE[1] has restarted 3 times, it will make the make package switch, interrupting the critical SERVICE[0] during the switch.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any configuration that would permit to avoid the switch when SERVICE[1] has reached its max number of restart ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ThX in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;BR</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024453#M57567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gousset</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-21T11:59:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to avoid side effect between critical and non critical services in a package ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024454#M57568</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Configure them in three independent packages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024454#M57568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-21T13:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to avoid side effect between critical and non critical services in a package ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024455#M57569</link>
      <description>You may also want to look at the new package features in the 11.18 version of Serviceguard.  The docs for the HP-UX version are posted &lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/ha.html." target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/ha.html.&lt;/A&gt;  The Linux version will be available in July.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024455#M57569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Serviceguard for Linux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-22T13:18:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to avoid side effect between critical and non critical services in a package ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024456#M57570</link>
      <description>You have a package that has 2 services, which are either essential to the operation of the package, or they both determine the operational status of the package.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However per you message, one service is not as critical as the other and may actually interfere with the continued operation of the package.&lt;BR /&gt;My question is, why use the 2nd service if if is not as critical?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, when a SERVICE approaches the MAX_RESTARTS value, you can reset it if you wish.  The man page shows the format:&lt;BR /&gt;cmmodpkg [-v] -R -s service_name package_name&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Reset the restart counter for service SVC1 in package PKG1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;              cmmodpkg -R -s SVC1 PKG1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or you may simply change the SERVICE_RESTARTS parameter in the package control script to "-R" and it will restart infinitely and never interfere with package operation - which goes back to, what is the point of creating a service that you don't really want to control package operation.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/how-to-avoid-side-effect-between-critical-and-non-critical/m-p/4024456#M57570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Doud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-26T09:16:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

