<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RHEL SPICE protocol vs. Vmware View Desktop in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784722#M59774</link>
    <description>We have 2Mbps WAN with 40-60ms latency.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-05T14:18:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RHEL SPICE protocol vs. Vmware View Desktop</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784720#M59772</link>
      <description>hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to know how is RHEL SPICE protocol comparing to Vmware View Desktop across the low WAN?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784720#M59772</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-05T13:26:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RHEL SPICE protocol vs. Vmware View Desktop</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784721#M59773</link>
      <description>Care to Qualify "low wan" speeds?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think at a minimum, SPICE RDP should work fairly well over at least a sustained 512KB/s wan link.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On a LAN however , SPICE Desktops seems to smoke vMware View by a mile. Ditto with Window's new RemoteFX.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can even do HD Apps like Flash-HD, Native HTML 5 video in HD over a Spice Desktop on LAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your backend needs a bit of CPU oomph though on a Spice Desktop Infrastructure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784721#M59773</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-05T13:43:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RHEL SPICE protocol vs. Vmware View Desktop</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784722#M59774</link>
      <description>We have 2Mbps WAN with 40-60ms latency.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784722#M59774</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-05T14:18:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RHEL SPICE protocol vs. Vmware View Desktop</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784723#M59775</link>
      <description>Then that IMHO will be more than enough - unless you're clients wil always be doing Hi-Def desktop "activity" ;^)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But do peruse bandwidth/infrastructure planning guides for RHEL SPice and vMware View sir to be sure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rhel-spice-protocol-vs-vmware-view-desktop/m-p/4784723#M59775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-05T15:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

