<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Degradation in performance before disk array accelerator battery charge error reported in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4814733#M59877</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Shalom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Battery being low can lead to erratic performance on the RAID card. It is very important to act on these warnings and replace that battery when the warning is received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SEP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-06T00:13:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Degradation in performance before disk array accelerator battery charge error reported</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4813393#M59876</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;recently we had a HP ProLiant DL360 G5﻿ on CentOS 4.9 that ran into a "POST Error: 1794-Drive Array - Array Accelerator Battery Charge Low﻿". &amp;nbsp;Looking at performance stats before the error I can see that IO wait was peaking at 12% where as now its at 3% and can also see increased disk utilisation before the issue too. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any explanation of why an issue with the battery charge leading up to the failure might have caused the increased load, disk util etc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know the specific behaviour of the write cache based on the status of the battery e.g. charge &amp;lt;75% then no write cache, or is it more comlpex than that?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason﻿&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4813393#M59876</guid>
      <dc:creator>jhodder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-05T06:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Degradation in performance before disk array accelerator battery charge error reported</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4814733#M59877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Shalom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Battery being low can lead to erratic performance on the RAID card. It is very important to act on these warnings and replace that battery when the warning is received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SEP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4814733#M59877</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-06T00:13:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Degradation in performance before disk array accelerator battery charge error reported</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4815075#M59878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Steven,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much for your feedback. &amp;nbsp;So I understand correctly are you saying a battery with low charge but still above the 75% threshold (ie 100-76%) can still affect performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the key fact that I am trying to understand. &amp;nbsp;We definitely saw issues on the servers when the charge dipped below 75%. &amp;nbsp;But before the event we so no errors and exrta load on the box. &amp;nbsp;That extra load didnt cause a performance issue but it was noticeable and so far unexplained. &amp;nbsp;It could just be down to our application (in this case tomcat) slowly eating up resource over time but I am also out of interest pursuing the possibility of the battery being a contributing factor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/degradation-in-performance-before-disk-array-accelerator-battery/m-p/4815075#M59878</guid>
      <dc:creator>jhodder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-06T07:21:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

