<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic clustering VirtualMachine or a Service ? in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539310#M60127</link>
    <description>we are running Oracle and Postfix cluster, and quite satisfied.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but people also run cluster of their Virtual Machines.(i.e instead of clustering service e.g Postfix, they cluster the vm on which postfix runs)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;which approach is better ?&lt;BR /&gt;pros and cons ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;please share your knowledge and comments.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-24T17:41:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>clustering VirtualMachine or a Service ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539310#M60127</link>
      <description>we are running Oracle and Postfix cluster, and quite satisfied.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but people also run cluster of their Virtual Machines.(i.e instead of clustering service e.g Postfix, they cluster the vm on which postfix runs)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;which approach is better ?&lt;BR /&gt;pros and cons ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;please share your knowledge and comments.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539310#M60127</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-24T17:41:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: clustering VirtualMachine or a Service ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539311#M60128</link>
      <description>it works great especially if you do not have a application that works well with clustering software or you do not want to change how a app starts but just start it when system boots.   This allows the application to be installed and started up the same way as a standalone system.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With Integrity virtual machine and ServiceGuard on HPUX you can move a clustered virtual machine from one VM host to another while the machine is running. The VM guests can be HPUX, VMS, Windows or Linux.    I was impressed when I got it working plus there is a application monitoring api with the most recent release.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure about clustering VMs on linux since I am a HPUX guy but it should be the same.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:44:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539311#M60128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emil Velez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-25T04:44:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: clustering VirtualMachine or a Service ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539312#M60129</link>
      <description>Emil summarized the pros of the VMs pretty well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cons:&lt;BR /&gt;If the physical hardware that is running the VM loses power or otherwise dies suddenly, the current run state of the VM will often be lost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At this point, the VM must be rebooted on the failover host, which causes the usual filesystem checks, just like when crashing &amp;amp; rebooting a physical server. This can take a while.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If your SLA requirements are so strict that you would be considering Oracle RAC or similar active/active clustering solutions, a simple VM clustering solution may not be able to fail over fast enough in a hardware failure situation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On the other hand, Postfix as such is a pretty lightweight service and email does not usually require guaranteed super-fast response times anyway. (Of course, external anti-spam and anti-virus functions can add significantly to the total workload).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If your Oracle database is a multi-terabyte, high-traffic monster, the performance penalty of virtualization might be important: you can get more raw performance from the hardware by leaving out the virtualization layer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MK</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539312#M60129</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-25T09:29:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: clustering VirtualMachine or a Service ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539313#M60130</link>
      <description>thanks for such a nice response and help... appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would also highly appreciate, if you can provide me some document/url that compares(pros and cons) the two approach ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Maaz</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/clustering-virtualmachine-or-a-service/m-p/4539313#M60130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-25T09:58:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

