<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: redhat cluster without fence device in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198461#M61801</link>
    <description>"mkqdisk -c /dev/devicename -l quorumlablename"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is the syntax i remember;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skt_skt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-12T13:32:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>redhat cluster without fence device</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198459#M61799</link>
      <description>hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have installed redhat el 5.1 on 2 x dl380 g5 with a shared storage (msa2012sa).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have completed system configuration and multipath config. I even configured one lun to be use as quorum device.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i execute the following command to activate the device a quorum device.&lt;BR /&gt;mkqdisk /dev/mapper/mpath3p1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but when i start configure cluster, it ask about program for quorum device heuristic? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and then it ask to configure fence device. Can i skip this if i have quorom device. Configuring ILO for fencing device is not an option as we dont have enough network port allocate for it for the ILO. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can this config works?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198459#M61799</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khairy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T11:52:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: redhat cluster without fence device</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198460#M61800</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Technically it does work. However, fencing is strongly recommended for data integrity. If ILO-fencing is not an option then you should look into imnplementing power fencing or/and SCSI reservation, etc ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198460#M61800</guid>
      <dc:creator>loco_vikide</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-11T12:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: redhat cluster without fence device</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198461#M61801</link>
      <description>"mkqdisk -c /dev/devicename -l quorumlablename"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is the syntax i remember;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198461#M61801</guid>
      <dc:creator>skt_skt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-12T13:32:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: redhat cluster without fence device</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198462#M61802</link>
      <description>thanks all. I will proceed with iLo config for primary fencing and quorum as 2nd level of fencing.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/redhat-cluster-without-fence-device/m-p/5198462#M61802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khairy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-13T07:50:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

