<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Linux functional equivalent of vi -x / ex -x in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078937#M62932</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks both,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I always use the vi name, so I didn't think to try the vim name. It asks for the key twice. Perhaps reasonable for a new file, but a bit odd when it already exists.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there an equivalent to ex -v? I'm doing something like:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;w=word&lt;BR /&gt;x="$(echo "/$w/p" | ex -x)"&lt;BR /&gt;print -n "$x"&lt;BR /&gt;sleep 5&lt;BR /&gt;printf "\r                  \n"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;in a script under Unix. The vi -x is just for maintenance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wouldn't be allowed to install GPG.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David G Ledger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-01T09:56:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux functional equivalent of vi -x / ex -x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078934#M62929</link>
      <description>Is there a functional equivalent of the vi -x and/or ex -x Unix commands in Linux. I realise that the encryption function would probably be different. I just want to maintain a list and extract lines, all in an encrypted form.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078934#M62929</guid>
      <dc:creator>David G Ledger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T06:04:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux functional equivalent of vi -x / ex -x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078935#M62930</link>
      <description>David,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Use vim -x</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078935#M62930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luk Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T06:12:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux functional equivalent of vi -x / ex -x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078936#M62931</link>
      <description>Alternativly you can use GnuPG for encrypted files (both sync &amp;amp; async) with vim. See &lt;A href="http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/script.php?script_id=661" target="_blank"&gt;http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/script.php?script_id=661&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:12:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078936#M62931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Van den Broeck Tijl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T08:12:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux functional equivalent of vi -x / ex -x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078937#M62932</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks both,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I always use the vi name, so I didn't think to try the vim name. It asks for the key twice. Perhaps reasonable for a new file, but a bit odd when it already exists.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there an equivalent to ex -v? I'm doing something like:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;w=word&lt;BR /&gt;x="$(echo "/$w/p" | ex -x)"&lt;BR /&gt;print -n "$x"&lt;BR /&gt;sleep 5&lt;BR /&gt;printf "\r                  \n"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;in a script under Unix. The vi -x is just for maintenance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wouldn't be allowed to install GPG.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-functional-equivalent-of-vi-x-ex-x/m-p/4078937#M62932</guid>
      <dc:creator>David G Ledger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T09:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

