<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ? in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787690#M66111</link>
    <description>no, i don't believe it to be true. there are however some nice things about it. i used it for a long time with both lotus notes and outlook. the programs work, but there are some glitches here and there (nothing serious though, at least not for me).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the nice things are:&lt;BR /&gt;no reboots, yeeh! crossover will simulate a reboot for the windows environment, but your system just stays up.&lt;BR /&gt;bottles, which are nice, because you can now try out software in a bottle and not be afraid that it might ruin/mess up/destroy anything important (like your mails).&lt;BR /&gt;archives of bottles, so if your windows blows up anyway (it always will after a while, windows is windows and wine runs the software the same way so...) you can just restore the archive and done, no reinstall needed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the applications themself are not more stable in the pure sense of the word, no.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 01:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dirk dierickx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-15T01:55:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787686#M66107</link>
      <description>hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I heard, MS Office applications with CrossOver should run more stable than under MS Windows ?&lt;BR /&gt;is it true ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;chris</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 08:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787686#M66107</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-13T08:43:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787687#M66108</link>
      <description>Shalom Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may wish to explain what "with Crossover" means.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have run the Microsoft Application Suite under wine (windows emulation) and on the native OS. I have found the applications themselves to be somewhat more stable under Windows.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have however found the OS itself, Windows much less stable than Linux.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What muddies the judgement somewhat is that its sometimes hard to tell whether a failure is from the OS or application.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 12:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787687#M66108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-13T12:55:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787688#M66109</link>
      <description>At the time I've installed MSoffice 2000 with CrossOver on my linux (redhat 8).&lt;BR /&gt;Hm, it was pretty stable.As for more stable-I don't think so...&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 14:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787688#M66109</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Chuzhoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-13T14:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787689#M66110</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is review regarding MS office Crossover&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/12/14/1716222&amp;amp;from=rss" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/12/14/1716222&amp;amp;from=rss&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://linuxgazette.net/113/youngman.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://linuxgazette.net/113/youngman.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6153" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6153&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyhow, I think the MS office application with CrossOver is very stable more then windows.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sung</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 18:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787689#M66110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sung Oh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-13T18:57:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787690#M66111</link>
      <description>no, i don't believe it to be true. there are however some nice things about it. i used it for a long time with both lotus notes and outlook. the programs work, but there are some glitches here and there (nothing serious though, at least not for me).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the nice things are:&lt;BR /&gt;no reboots, yeeh! crossover will simulate a reboot for the windows environment, but your system just stays up.&lt;BR /&gt;bottles, which are nice, because you can now try out software in a bottle and not be afraid that it might ruin/mess up/destroy anything important (like your mails).&lt;BR /&gt;archives of bottles, so if your windows blows up anyway (it always will after a while, windows is windows and wine runs the software the same way so...) you can just restore the archive and done, no reinstall needed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the applications themself are not more stable in the pure sense of the word, no.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 01:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787690#M66111</guid>
      <dc:creator>dirk dierickx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T01:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MS Office with CrossOver more stable than under MS Windows ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787691#M66112</link>
      <description>I've heard some nice things about Crossover, but have yet to see it in a production environment.  Most everybody I know runs openoffice.  For those poor few that have to have Outlook, the solutions have been Outlook Web Access, Outlook running under Wine, or a 3rd party application.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 11:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ms-office-with-crossover-more-stable-than-under-ms-windows/m-p/3787691#M66112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan_152</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T11:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

