<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72 in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089876#M7062</link>
    <description>Here is an update - &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Veritas has given us a patch to fix this issue, but we cannot load the patch because od a kernel version mismatch between the Kernel and the patch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The patch supposedly fixes a nfsd bug which causes the system to panic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have now been elevated to a higher level of support and am awaiting a call from Veritas.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dhiresh Vyas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-10-20T13:35:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089871#M7057</link>
      <description>Our ML530 Server hangs on performing multiple large file transfers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The current setup is as follws -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hardware&lt;BR /&gt;ML530 G2&lt;BR /&gt;5304/256 raid controller&lt;BR /&gt;Drives 1-2 Raid 1&lt;BR /&gt;Drives 3-6 Raid 5 with online spare&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;O/S&lt;BR /&gt;RedHat 7.2 - We are limited to this because we run Veritas netbackup and that requires 7.2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are also running Veritas File system on the Raid 5 drives.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Problems&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some of the data folders are exported using exportfs, and when one tries to copy several files to the NFS client, the server freezes after 10 minutes.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WHen the server freezes, all the drive lights are a steady green.  Keyboard and mouse are not responsive, but server responds to ping.  The only way out of this is a power cycle.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If we copy the same files via scp (as opposed to using the mounts) the server does not crash.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help in this matter will be greatly appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089871#M7057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiresh Vyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-09T13:59:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089872#M7058</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;If you find nothing in dmesg or in /var/log/messages on in all the log files in /var/log/* or even in your sar reports, I would considere using a tool like tcpdump.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;#tcpdump -lvv &amp;gt; tcpdump.dat&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;beware this could generate lots of data in "10 minutes"on a busy network so you may need lot of space.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;and also check logs on the other node if you can ... in despair you could also tcpdump from there too ... &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;This is sometimes hard to track, the above is only a way to determine if this is a network resource problem or more a raid/disk nfs problem.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Hope it help, and keep us informed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;J-P&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:05:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089872#M7058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Huc_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-09T16:05:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089873#M7059</link>
      <description>I have tcpdump running for now.  Will be able to post some results later.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089873#M7059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiresh Vyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-14T10:01:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089874#M7060</link>
      <description>I would be interested in the clients logs myself.  What OS is the client and what kernel version does Red HAt 7.2 run?&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;NFS was a bit odd on Linux a while ago.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089874#M7060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Grant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-14T10:09:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089875#M7061</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;I would be interested in the clients logs &amp;gt;myself. What OS is the client and what &amp;gt;kernel version does Red HAt 7.2 run?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The NFS client Runs RH 8 kernel 2.4.18-14smp&lt;BR /&gt;Server runs 2.4.7-10smp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The client log always shows &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kernel: nfs: server 10.10.10.20 not responding, timed out, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;umount gives me - &lt;BR /&gt;kernel: nfs_statfs: statfs error = 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;NFS was a bit odd on Linux a while ago.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are trying to install a nfsfix from veritas, but there seem to be some version conflicts with the patch and after applying it, nfsd does not start, so we are forced to uninstall and go back to the native nfsd module.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089875#M7061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiresh Vyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-14T21:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089876#M7062</link>
      <description>Here is an update - &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Veritas has given us a patch to fix this issue, but we cannot load the patch because od a kernel version mismatch between the Kernel and the patch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The patch supposedly fixes a nfsd bug which causes the system to panic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have now been elevated to a higher level of support and am awaiting a call from Veritas.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089876#M7062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiresh Vyas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T13:35:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ML530 Hangs on RH 72</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089877#M7063</link>
      <description>This is bizarre. We've been told that NetBackup would run regardless of the kernel version - something  that does make sense, as there are no parts of NetBackup that are kernel dependent.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;So my bet is that you're depending on Veritas because of VxFS. And if it's so, I have some bad news:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;* the kernels that VxFS supports have sluggish SCSI performance. When certifying VxFS and VxVM for Linux I've noticed that. Upgrading from 2.4.7-10smp to newer and clean 2.4.19 raised SCSI performance by  nearly 500% (2400kB/s in 2.4.7 versus 9800 kB/s in 2.4.19).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;* it's not neccessary to use VxFS. Linux has other journalled filesystems with excellent performance. I personally recommend using XFS in light of recent benchmarks; if you do need the maximum flexibility of VxFS then ReiserFS is also a great choice.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Talk with your Veritas representative. There's no sense forcing the customers to use an old (and soon to EOL) version of Red Hat OS.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Good luck,&lt;BR /&gt;Paulo Fessel</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:07:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ml530-hangs-on-rh-72/m-p/3089877#M7063</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paulo A G Fessel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T14:07:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

