<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Linux in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269292#M71986</link>
    <description>Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;    We are in the process of installing a two-node Oracle 9i RAC on Red Hat&lt;BR /&gt;Linux AS on Itanium server. This also happens to be our first RAC implementation on Itanium Linux.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;We would like to know, whether adding a third node to the cluster will cause any problem. We have seen success stories with 2/4 nodes in a&lt;BR /&gt;RAC. However, we have not seen the ones with odd numbers. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Anybody here who has done a 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Itanium Linux ? Were these any issues ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any info on the same would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA&lt;BR /&gt;Sid</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 04:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sid_16</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-05-06T04:07:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269292#M71986</link>
      <description>Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;    We are in the process of installing a two-node Oracle 9i RAC on Red Hat&lt;BR /&gt;Linux AS on Itanium server. This also happens to be our first RAC implementation on Itanium Linux.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;We would like to know, whether adding a third node to the cluster will cause any problem. We have seen success stories with 2/4 nodes in a&lt;BR /&gt;RAC. However, we have not seen the ones with odd numbers. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Anybody here who has done a 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Itanium Linux ? Were these any issues ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any info on the same would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA&lt;BR /&gt;Sid</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 04:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269292#M71986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sid_16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-06T04:07:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269293#M71987</link>
      <description>Sid,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Currently I have a 2-node cluster for test purposes. The official plan is for a 3-node RAC cluster and has been written by an Oracle consultant. He did not mention any problems with 3 nodes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;JP.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 09:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269293#M71987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroen Peereboom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-06T09:52:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269294#M71988</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There area no problems with odd number of servers in a 9i RAC configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;You MUST follow all pre-reqs and you wonÂ´t have any kind of problems.&lt;BR /&gt;Current, we have a pre-prod cluster with RH ES 3 Linux and Oracle 9i with 3 servers and MSA 1000 storage.&lt;BR /&gt;I think the problem of more then 2 servers is the connections to storage. If you use SCSI this can be a problem</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 08:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269294#M71988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Yamawaki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-08T08:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3-Node Oracle 9i RAC on Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269295#M71989</link>
      <description>There is absolutely no problem adding a third node. Personally I like 3 nodes as is it the minimum needed to have low impact reduced availability.&lt;BR /&gt;If one of 2 nodes, each running at 60% usage average, fail then the remain needs to do 120% worth of work. The users will notice.&lt;BR /&gt;If one of 3 nodes, each running at 60%, fails then if you take one down the remaining 2 must deliver 90% each. Minor impact.&lt;BR /&gt;In the 4 node case you can load up to 70% average and still have a little head room to spare if one fails and the remaining boxes take must produce just over 90% each.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some folks at Oracle (RAC designers) I worked with are convinced that RAC scales linearly only after 3 nodes, as for data contention resolution at the most 3 nodes will get involved, no matter how many nodes there are in the RAC cluster. I have a hard time believing/mearusing that.&lt;BR /&gt;In very course numbers, and application dependend of course, one could speculate the following numbers:&lt;BR /&gt;Assume 1 node with no rac delivers 100% work.&lt;BR /&gt;Switch on RAC and drop to 95%.&lt;BR /&gt;Add a second node and you add 'only' 90% more work power.&lt;BR /&gt;The third node and beyond would then add 85% of the base performance for eache node added.&lt;BR /&gt;The numbers are made up, but based on some RAC observations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth,&lt;BR /&gt;Hein.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 14:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/3-node-oracle-9i-rac-on-linux/m-p/3269295#M71989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hein van den Heuvel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-08T14:23:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

