<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: time syncronization linux w2k in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060517#M73884</link>
    <description>BTW, I find it a lot more convenient to put all the active (uncommented) statements in the "ntp.conf" file at the *beginning*, so that you can see at a glance what you've got, rather than dispersing them throughout the comments.  You can always scroll down to the comments if you forget exactly what the statements are doing ;&amp;gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks to me that you've got 2 guys running, or trying to run:&lt;BR /&gt;     xntpd&lt;BR /&gt;and  ntpd&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Did you download and compile your own latest version of the code?  When you do this, the 'make' build produces 'ntpd'.  Also, it looks like the latest rpm uses 'ntpd'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure of the origin of "xntpd", but I also run the ntp daemon as 'xntpd', mainly because that's the way HP did it for HP-UX, so when I was building for HP-UX, I kept the "xntpd" name.  This means, of course, that after the build, I have to do my own manual install and change it from 'ntpd' (actually, I simply do symbolic links).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;bv&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 09:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob_Vance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-09-03T09:50:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060507#M73874</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;I try to syncronize the clock of a win2k server sp3 (is a domain controller) and a linux RedHat 7.3. The win2k take the tme from an external source and distributed it in the local network.On linux side the ntpd daemon is running and it recognize the w2k server but it won't set its time. with ethereal I saw that the two machines exchange the ntp packet buttime on linux side is not changed to the correct time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;can help me somebody?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards Karoly</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 05:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060507#M73874</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathe karoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T05:56:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060508#M73875</link>
      <description>what is your settings for ntp on linux and Windows sides?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Vitaly.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 06:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060508#M73875</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vitaly Karasik_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T06:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060509#M73876</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;are there any error messages on the logs?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;perhaps your time on the linux system is very diffrent from the time on the windows machine&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the time deamon can only fix times that are around some seconds diffrent else it wont work&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;greetz&lt;BR /&gt;Peter</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 06:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060509#M73876</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Reuschlein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T06:35:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060510#M73877</link>
      <description>as usual,&lt;BR /&gt;any errors / messages in the logs.&lt;BR /&gt;-b-</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 08:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060510#M73877</guid>
      <dc:creator>Balaji N</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T08:10:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060511#M73878</link>
      <description>HP-UX has a command.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ntpq -p &lt;IP_OF_TIME_SOURCE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There may be a Linux equivalent to test time sources.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Windows 2000 do not have proper Unix compliant time servers.  In some cases time will update, in others it will not.  The way to resolve the problem is to download and install Dr. David Mills(The inventor of ntp) NT/W2K time server package on the Windows 2000 server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I could not convince my own PCS department of this wisdom.  I have to check my servers at least once a week to see if they are still keeping good time.  The ntpq command produces an error.  You can achieve good time keeping with one of two approaches:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Install this software on the W2K time server:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/hints/winnt.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/hints/winnt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Read carefully its not obvious.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Use a real Unix/Linux workstation as a time server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP&lt;/IP_OF_TIME_SOURCE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 12:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060511#M73878</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T12:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060512#M73879</link>
      <description>Hello!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What the time difrence that you have?&lt;BR /&gt;Could be that the difrence is the difrence of&lt;BR /&gt;linux TZ time a Win time?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Caesar</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060512#M73879</guid>
      <dc:creator>Caesar_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-01T18:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060513#M73880</link>
      <description>When I had a similar issue I found setting up the NTP daemon to be slightly more complicated than I cared for, so I simply wrote a little script for cron to run once every morning...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$cat /etc/cron.daily/setdate  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#!/bin/sh&lt;BR /&gt;# setdate - script to synchronize the date/time on this server with&lt;BR /&gt;#               the corporate file server.&lt;BR /&gt;#               executed daily by cron (see cron.daily directory)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# Main Windows file server (in Seattle)&lt;BR /&gt;server=SVR-ROOT-DC1&lt;BR /&gt;logfile=/var/log/${0##*/}&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;echo "====================================" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; $logfile&lt;BR /&gt;echo "Before: `date` " &amp;gt;&amp;gt; $logfile&lt;BR /&gt;/usr/sbin/ntpdate $server &amp;gt;&amp;gt; $logfile&lt;BR /&gt;echo " After: `date` " &amp;gt;&amp;gt; $logfile&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Jared&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 03:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060513#M73880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jared Middleton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-02T03:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060514#M73881</link>
      <description>Here are the concatenated log and conf file for ntpd. As you can see sometimes ntpd can syncronize with w32 service but after it's a message for lost syncronization and after is a bad packet sent to the time server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The result of the ntpq-p is at the and of ntp.log&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe this can help&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060514#M73881</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathe karoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-02T07:25:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060515#M73882</link>
      <description>hmmm.. bad. i am unable to open the log. i get a 404. will report to Dan. by the way is it only me or everyone who gets this problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;can u try reposting the log.&lt;BR /&gt;thanks&lt;BR /&gt;-balaji</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:45:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060515#M73882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Balaji N</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-02T07:45:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060516#M73883</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 08:07:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060516#M73883</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathe karoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-02T08:07:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: time syncronization linux w2k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060517#M73884</link>
      <description>BTW, I find it a lot more convenient to put all the active (uncommented) statements in the "ntp.conf" file at the *beginning*, so that you can see at a glance what you've got, rather than dispersing them throughout the comments.  You can always scroll down to the comments if you forget exactly what the statements are doing ;&amp;gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks to me that you've got 2 guys running, or trying to run:&lt;BR /&gt;     xntpd&lt;BR /&gt;and  ntpd&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Did you download and compile your own latest version of the code?  When you do this, the 'make' build produces 'ntpd'.  Also, it looks like the latest rpm uses 'ntpd'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure of the origin of "xntpd", but I also run the ntp daemon as 'xntpd', mainly because that's the way HP did it for HP-UX, so when I was building for HP-UX, I kept the "xntpd" name.  This means, of course, that after the build, I have to do my own manual install and change it from 'ntpd' (actually, I simply do symbolic links).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;bv&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 09:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/time-syncronization-linux-w2k/m-p/3060517#M73884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Vance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-03T09:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

