<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Slow backup and kernel upgrade. in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/slow-backup-and-kernel-upgrade/m-p/2811868#M77579</link>
    <description>I have a DL360 with dual 1266MHz processors, 2GB memory, and two 18.2 GB hard drives mirrored using the integrated controller.  Partitions are formatted as ext3.   &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I have noticed that the backup is up to 10 times slower than similar systems we have using ext2 instead of ext3.  I am not utilizing any of the journaling capabilities of the filesystem. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;In addition, I have tried to upgrade the kernel from 2.4.7-10smp to 2.4.9-34smp.  I have tried using RHN and building one manually.  In each case, the machine hangs after the "Uncompressing linux..." message comes up on the console.  I have tried booting with 2.4.9-34 kernel with similar results. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Disk Config:[jzimmer@la_app2 jzimmer]$ df -h &lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p2       3.8G  2.9G  768M  80% / &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p7       6.4G  414M  5.6G   7% /opt &lt;BR /&gt;none                  1.0G     0  1.0G   0% /dev/shm &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p6       2.5G  134M  2.2G   6% /var &lt;BR /&gt;[jzimmer@la_app2 jzimmer]$ mount &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p2 on /</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-09-23T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Slow backup and kernel upgrade.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/slow-backup-and-kernel-upgrade/m-p/2811868#M77579</link>
      <description>I have a DL360 with dual 1266MHz processors, 2GB memory, and two 18.2 GB hard drives mirrored using the integrated controller.  Partitions are formatted as ext3.   &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I have noticed that the backup is up to 10 times slower than similar systems we have using ext2 instead of ext3.  I am not utilizing any of the journaling capabilities of the filesystem. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;In addition, I have tried to upgrade the kernel from 2.4.7-10smp to 2.4.9-34smp.  I have tried using RHN and building one manually.  In each case, the machine hangs after the "Uncompressing linux..." message comes up on the console.  I have tried booting with 2.4.9-34 kernel with similar results. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Disk Config:[jzimmer@la_app2 jzimmer]$ df -h &lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p2       3.8G  2.9G  768M  80% / &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p7       6.4G  414M  5.6G   7% /opt &lt;BR /&gt;none                  1.0G     0  1.0G   0% /dev/shm &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p6       2.5G  134M  2.2G   6% /var &lt;BR /&gt;[jzimmer@la_app2 jzimmer]$ mount &lt;BR /&gt;/dev/ida/c0d0p2 on /</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/slow-backup-and-kernel-upgrade/m-p/2811868#M77579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-23T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

