<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh? in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557326#M82476</link>
    <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;check this link :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.schumi.ch/partner/SSHvsVPN.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.schumi.ch/partner/SSHvsVPN.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- ok to your solution, for rsync only between two server somewhere on the internet you could use, only ssh, but if this servers are inside the DMZ/intranet, them you  could use VPN/IPSEC to create connection between corporate lan and internet placed server, and them if you have access use rsynv over SSH.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mikap</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:16:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michal Kapalka (mikap)</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-02T22:16:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557325#M82475</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to rsync some data between 2 linux machines over the Internet.&lt;BR /&gt;Is ipsec vpn tunnel more secure than ssh with a quite long and complicated password?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:35:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557325#M82475</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-02T19:35:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557326#M82476</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;check this link :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.schumi.ch/partner/SSHvsVPN.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.schumi.ch/partner/SSHvsVPN.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- ok to your solution, for rsync only between two server somewhere on the internet you could use, only ssh, but if this servers are inside the DMZ/intranet, them you  could use VPN/IPSEC to create connection between corporate lan and internet placed server, and them if you have access use rsynv over SSH.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mikap</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:16:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557326#M82476</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michal Kapalka (mikap)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-02T22:16:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557327#M82477</link>
      <description>If you wanna ramp up the security for the ssh connection, you could use&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the "command" and "from" settings in the file authorized_keys, which will allow the key-based access only from the "correct" server and will only allow him to run rsync.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A VPN will actually allow more access to the "authorized client" than a firewall restricted ssh will do, but opening up ssh just for rsync might be something to reconsider multiple times. If you don't have to, then don't make ssh available.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The actual transmission should be as secure with ssh than via a vpn, as they share most algorithms used for the encryption.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557327#M82477</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Heigl (new acc)</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-06T03:43:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557328#M82478</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;the "command" and "from" settings in the &amp;gt;file authorized_keys, which will allow the &amp;gt;key-based access only from the "correct" &amp;gt;server and will only allow him to run rsync.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thx, but can u pls give some more details how this should work?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557328#M82478</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-06T05:26:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557329#M82479</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These are two totally different, yet compatible technologies.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You could connect via an IPSEC/VPN and then rsync.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This would provide two layers of protection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is some configuration work to do, but it can be done.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Frankly however, rsync -e ssh and password free ssh authentication is good enough for most purposes. Only the NSA or people having very powerful computers have a chance to crack the encryption and that would take days or weeks of effort.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557329#M82479</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-06T16:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipsec tunnel more secure than ssh?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557330#M82480</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;the "command" and "from" settings in the file authorized_keys&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These are documented in the sshd man page, in the chapter titled "AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT". There's even an example authorized_keys file, demonstrating various settings.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MK</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/ipsec-tunnel-more-secure-than-ssh/m-p/4557330#M82480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matti_Kurkela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-06T17:06:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

