<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NIC bonding active failover mix in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586610#M82535</link>
    <description>Read a number of posts but needed something more specific.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In HPUX APA I can create two aggregates/channel groups and then assign one group to be LAN_MONITOR failover for the other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can I do the same with linux bonding ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason for the failover groups is that I have two cisco 2490 switches and cannot aggregate over both.  With the method above I get increased bandwidth as well as failover if one switch were to fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Tim&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-18T18:45:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NIC bonding active failover mix</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586610#M82535</link>
      <description>Read a number of posts but needed something more specific.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In HPUX APA I can create two aggregates/channel groups and then assign one group to be LAN_MONITOR failover for the other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can I do the same with linux bonding ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason for the failover groups is that I have two cisco 2490 switches and cannot aggregate over both.  With the method above I get increased bandwidth as well as failover if one switch were to fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Tim&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586610#M82535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T18:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC bonding active failover mix</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586611#M82536</link>
      <description>Shalom Tim,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Linux bonding has a number of modes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can with enough cards, create bonded groups. The monitor function is not really there, you will have to write a script for that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In /etc/modprobe.conf you can choose bonding mode. The documentation is a little hard to read, but there are several choices for mode, one of which might meet your needs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586611#M82536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T19:07:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC bonding active failover mix</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586612#M82537</link>
      <description>Thanks SEP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Leaning towards mode 4 but I need to see what my network group has to say about it..  i believe the biggest issue with two switches is a spanning tree loop that can be created ( might be way off here)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;0 â   Sets a round-robin policy for fault tolerance and load balancing. Transmissions are received&lt;BR /&gt;and sent out sequentially on each bonded slave interface beginning with the first one available.&lt;BR /&gt;1 â   Sets an active-backup policy for fault tolerance. Transmissions are received and sent out via&lt;BR /&gt;the first available bonded slave interface. Another bonded slave interface is only used if the active&lt;BR /&gt;bonded slave interface fails.&lt;BR /&gt;2 â   Sets an XOR (exclusive-or) policy for fault tolerance and load balancing. Using this method,&lt;BR /&gt;the interface matches up the incoming request's MAC address with the MAC address for one of the&lt;BR /&gt;slave NICs. Once this link is established, transmissions are sent out sequentially beginning with the&lt;BR /&gt;first available interface.&lt;BR /&gt;3 â   Sets a broadcast policy for fault tolerance. All transmissions are sent on all slave interfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;4 â   Sets an IEEE 802.3ad dynamic link aggregation policy. Creates aggregation groups that share&lt;BR /&gt;the same speed and duplex settings. Transmits and receives on all slaves in the active aggregator.&lt;BR /&gt;Requires a switch that is 802.3ad compliant.&lt;BR /&gt;5 â   Sets a Transmit Load Balancing (TLB) policy for fault tolerance and load balancing. The&lt;BR /&gt;outgoing traffic is distributed according to the current load on each slave interface. Incoming traffic is&lt;BR /&gt;received by the current slave. If the receiving slave fails, another slave takes over the MAC address&lt;BR /&gt;of the failed slave.&lt;BR /&gt;6 â   Sets an Active Load Balancing (ALB) policy for fault tolerance and load balancing. Includes&lt;BR /&gt;transmit and receive load balancing for IPV4 traffic. Receive load balancing is achieved through&lt;BR /&gt;ARP negotiation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/nic-bonding-active-failover-mix/m-p/4586612#M82537</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-18T19:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

