<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RPM conflicts in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137325#M8386</link>
    <description>please be aware of the consequences before you force upgrade an rpm. if you break some dependency, then you might end up with some application not being working.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;my 2paise.&lt;BR /&gt;-balaji</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:24:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Balaji N</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-05T12:24:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137321#M8382</link>
      <description>Here is a small bit of the error when i try to install a rpm after a tar.gz file was installed. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;file /usr/share/man/man1/spkac.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man1/sslpasswd.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man1/sslrand.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man1/verify.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with&lt;BR /&gt;file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man1/version.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man1/x509.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man5/config.5ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with&lt;BR /&gt;file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/man/man7/des_modes.7ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;        file /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt from install of openssl-0.9.7a-20 conflicts with&lt;BR /&gt;file from package openssl-0.9.7a-2&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137321#M8382</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyle D. Harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T09:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137322#M8383</link>
      <description>These conflicts don't conflict with a tar.gz install.  they conflict with a previous rpm that was installed.  Remove "openssl-0.9.7a-2" rpm.  Of course, these names are so similar that they might actually be the same one and the last "0" got lost in the cut and paste. If so then I am wrong and it is conflicting with something else.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;You could try "forcing" the rpm install as, if they really are the same or it is conflicting with a previous .gz file, it wont really matter because it's the same software.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I think its "rpm --force -i" but you might want to check the man page on that or wait for Huc to tell you :)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137322#M8383</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Grant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T10:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137323#M8384</link>
      <description>Hmmm very interesting. I looked and the "0" did not in fact get lost in the cut in paste. It really is just the 2 it ends with. Maybe i'll try the force.... Thanks Mark.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137323#M8384</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyle D. Harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T10:15:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137324#M8385</link>
      <description>You must upgrade the old openssl-0.9.7a-2 package.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# rpm -Fvh openssl-0.9.7a-20.i386.rpm&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"F" option will only upgrade a package if an older version is already installed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sergejs</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137324#M8385</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergejs Svitnevs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T11:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137325#M8386</link>
      <description>please be aware of the consequences before you force upgrade an rpm. if you break some dependency, then you might end up with some application not being working.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;my 2paise.&lt;BR /&gt;-balaji</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:24:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137325#M8386</guid>
      <dc:creator>Balaji N</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T12:24:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137326#M8387</link>
      <description>An other one !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have tryed to answer this in the following link&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=292708" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=292708&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;please follow-up there ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;J-P</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137326#M8387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Huc_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T17:02:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPM conflicts</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137327#M8388</link>
      <description>Maybe it is a good idea to first check what rpm thinks you have installed:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;zinser@bibo:~&amp;gt; rpm -q -a | grep -i ssl&lt;BR /&gt;openssl-0.9.6i-12&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(And yes, I do have a never SSL, but that was installed directly from the source tarball, so rpm does not know about it ;-)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rpm-conflicts/m-p/3137327#M8388</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin P.J. Zinser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-05T17:26:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

