<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DL580 &amp;amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3) in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606406#M85076</link>
    <description>Ok, technical knowledge base helped once again: &lt;A href="http://www5.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=200000078411083" target="_blank"&gt;http://www5.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=200000078411083&lt;/A&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-08-18T05:04:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DL580 &amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606405#M85075</link>
      <description>I'm having continuous link problems with those NC7170 nics. Configuration is as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- two-node ServiceGuard cluster&lt;BR /&gt;- bond0 (eth0 &amp;amp; eth4)&lt;BR /&gt;- bond1 (eth1 &amp;amp; eth5)&lt;BR /&gt;- and of course, both nics belongins to same bond are connected to separate switches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you look the attached file you can see that links go down very often, and come up on same second. Am I having faulty hardware or what? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Should I increase the value of 'miimon' on bond configuration to get rid of those messages? (miimon is now 100ms). That doesn't sound very reasonable solution. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hardware configuration is identical on both nodes, but the problem exist mainly in first node.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:27:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606405#M85075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T04:27:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DL580 &amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606406#M85076</link>
      <description>Ok, technical knowledge base helped once again: &lt;A href="http://www5.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=200000078411083" target="_blank"&gt;http://www5.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&amp;amp;docId=200000078411083&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606406#M85076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T05:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DL580 &amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606407#M85077</link>
      <description>hai&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;try to decrease the speed of the nic card by mii-tool</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606407#M85077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tvs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T06:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DL580 &amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606408#M85078</link>
      <description>We have almost 300 servers running bonding &lt;BR /&gt;and we get these errors often and it is not going affect the performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We never face any connection loss or performance degradation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if you are using 2 switches,Ask your Network engg to trunk(ISL) the switches.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606408#M85078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Durgaprasad Ala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-18T14:07:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DL580 &amp; NC7170 link problem (RH3)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606409#M85079</link>
      <description>Looks like I had to increase the value of miimon. As you can see from attached file, the bond0 goes down, and ServiceGuard notices that bond0 is down and initiates a failover (back to same node, but still a failover.) I'm not using the option use_carrier. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/dl580-amp-nc7170-link-problem-rh3/m-p/3606409#M85079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-23T01:31:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

