<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755874#M86017</link>
    <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For full functionality in modes other than 0 you need to configure the switch. A lot of Cisco admin's don't know how to do this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Active-Active configuration freaks out the switch, for lack of a better term and you lose networking altogether.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-21T22:44:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755870#M86013</link>
      <description>have configured linux bonding using mode 0 (rr) and working fine.Trying to connect each port to two different cisco switches for switch redundancy. May i know is there anything i need to configure at the switch level cos i am getting Mac address flapping.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;OS is RHEL3.0 AS3.0x86_64 U6.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:37:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755870#M86013</guid>
      <dc:creator>NIC bonding and switch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T10:37:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755871#M86014</link>
      <description>As far I know, round robin requires switch link aggregation. I think that this is not possible on independen switches, you should use mode 1 (failover).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755871#M86014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Ferreira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T11:15:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755872#M86015</link>
      <description>Thanks. What about for other modes ? like 4,5 or 6 ? can i connect them to 2 different switches for redundancy. As far as i know, don't think RHEL3.0 support mode 4,5 and 6. Please correct me if i am wrong.&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755872#M86015</guid>
      <dc:creator>NIC bonding and switch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T11:21:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755873#M86016</link>
      <description>can you define "fine" in this case?  it has always been my understanding that round-robin apcket scheduling (on a packet by packet basis) is an invitation to getting TCP segments out of order.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TCP will "cope" but will not operate as efficiently.  Particularly if the bond/trunk/aggregate starts to get above two links.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For official protocols, switches probably grok LACP.  What mode number that happens to be escapes me presently - might be nice for thelinux bonding software to be enhanced to take human-meaningful names for the modes...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ciscos also like Fast Etherchannel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This last bit is stretching my dimm memory, but if you want "active-active" with multiple switches you need support for "meshing"</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755873#M86016</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T21:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755874#M86017</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For full functionality in modes other than 0 you need to configure the switch. A lot of Cisco admin's don't know how to do this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Active-Active configuration freaks out the switch, for lack of a better term and you lose networking altogether.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755874#M86017</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-21T22:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux bonding and Switch configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755875#M86018</link>
      <description>With the split-MLT in the Nortel switches, they appear as a single switch to the bond port and you configuration will be possible.  AFAIK, Cisco switches do not have these features.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/linux-bonding-and-switch-configuration/m-p/3755875#M86018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergejs Svitnevs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-22T01:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

