<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Samba server problem - possible answer to Steven Protter's original prob in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/samba-server-problem-possible-answer-to-steven-protter-s/m-p/3411300#M86463</link>
    <description>Hi guys,&lt;BR /&gt;sorry to barge in the discussion of the SAMBA problem that Steven Protter had in early September about not getting a samba mount on the machine "storage".  I am not sure if I got this correct, but it sounded like Steven fixed the problem by reinstalling the Fedora Core OS and things magically worked.  I know he also got hints from others (Sridhar and Massimo), but I am not sure if he really got the answer to what might have been wrong. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think I might have the answer.  I came up with a similar problem on my end where I wasn't able to mount via smbfs off of one machine, which was running FC1.  I searched the internet for similar discussions based on the error I was getting (&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Error connecting to 192.168.1.37 (No route to host)&lt;BR /&gt;11415: Connection to 192.168.1.37 failed&lt;BR /&gt;SMB connection failed&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;after involing a mount command in a similar way that Steven was.  Anyways, to make the story short, I followed the tip that someone mentioned of using "nmap" on the server.  And something interesting came back.  I noticed the   ports 137-139 were being filtered versus open or closed.  That indicated right away that I had a firewall running on that machine, of course.  After checking and verifying, I noticed that to be true and ssh and http were the only ones allowed to be accessed.  Quickly testing the theory, I shut off the firewall, restarted the samba server, and sure enough I was able to make it mount fine.  The only thing I wasn't able to do was restore the firewall to roughly what I had it before while letting through the ports 137-139 (netbios ports related to the samba mounting).  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess if I had a question for you all, how would I keep the firewall active allowing ssh, http open and then specifying somehow how to let ports 137-139 open?  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven, I could be wrong, perhaps you didn't have the firewall set on that machine, but that was the case for me.  And I certainly had similar symptoms on my connections when mounting via samba. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help on the question above would be great.  Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greg Schmidt_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-10-31T01:19:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Samba server problem - possible answer to Steven Protter's original prob</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/samba-server-problem-possible-answer-to-steven-protter-s/m-p/3411300#M86463</link>
      <description>Hi guys,&lt;BR /&gt;sorry to barge in the discussion of the SAMBA problem that Steven Protter had in early September about not getting a samba mount on the machine "storage".  I am not sure if I got this correct, but it sounded like Steven fixed the problem by reinstalling the Fedora Core OS and things magically worked.  I know he also got hints from others (Sridhar and Massimo), but I am not sure if he really got the answer to what might have been wrong. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think I might have the answer.  I came up with a similar problem on my end where I wasn't able to mount via smbfs off of one machine, which was running FC1.  I searched the internet for similar discussions based on the error I was getting (&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Error connecting to 192.168.1.37 (No route to host)&lt;BR /&gt;11415: Connection to 192.168.1.37 failed&lt;BR /&gt;SMB connection failed&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;after involing a mount command in a similar way that Steven was.  Anyways, to make the story short, I followed the tip that someone mentioned of using "nmap" on the server.  And something interesting came back.  I noticed the   ports 137-139 were being filtered versus open or closed.  That indicated right away that I had a firewall running on that machine, of course.  After checking and verifying, I noticed that to be true and ssh and http were the only ones allowed to be accessed.  Quickly testing the theory, I shut off the firewall, restarted the samba server, and sure enough I was able to make it mount fine.  The only thing I wasn't able to do was restore the firewall to roughly what I had it before while letting through the ports 137-139 (netbios ports related to the samba mounting).  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess if I had a question for you all, how would I keep the firewall active allowing ssh, http open and then specifying somehow how to let ports 137-139 open?  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven, I could be wrong, perhaps you didn't have the firewall set on that machine, but that was the case for me.  And I certainly had similar symptoms on my connections when mounting via samba. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help on the question above would be great.  Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/samba-server-problem-possible-answer-to-steven-protter-s/m-p/3411300#M86463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Schmidt_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-31T01:19:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Samba server problem - possible answer to Steven Protter's original prob</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/samba-server-problem-possible-answer-to-steven-protter-s/m-p/3411301#M86464</link>
      <description>I just love seeing my name in a subject.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a couple of problems that I never posted back into my own thread.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) There was a firewall on the target box and it did not allow Samba through. I was aware of that, though I may not have posted it and did extensive testing with the firewall down.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) The major problem was that the Samba version put in Red Hat ES 3 was broken. Its based on 3.0.2a Samba. That release is completely broken and should never have been let out into an Enterprise OS release.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Very interesting information. I'm going to bookmark this thread so I can access it next time I run into this problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;:-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/samba-server-problem-possible-answer-to-steven-protter-s/m-p/3411301#M86464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-31T01:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

