<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952839#M87357</link>
    <description>Wouldn't it make more sence NOT to disable the Path MTU ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This way a host or server can adjust their MTU size depending on the icmp notification they get.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Admin32</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-05-09T09:20:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952834#M87352</link>
      <description>Greetings once more everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm dealing with a Cisco powered VPN and I'm experiencing a few problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is the setup:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LAN---(eth0)GATEWAY(eth2)--VPN BOX----Internet--Customer&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The above setup has been tested and works fine. Gateway is running redhat v8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem I am having is when hosts from the LAN try to telnet to machines on the other side of the VPN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The gateway is routing and masquerading their connections so this way all connections from the LAN seem to be coming from the GATEWAY host.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since this is a VPN, the MTU is a very critical factor. Gateway;s eth2 interface, its been set to 1400. With this value everything works fine.&lt;BR /&gt;However, on eth0 its set to 1500 (default) and this is where the problems occur.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I try to telnet from the LAN to the other side of the VPN, I can log in, but when I try to run Pine or do a 'ls', because the data to be transfered back to me is a lot, the session hangs. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At this point the only solution I can think of is to set eth0's mtu to 1400 but Im trying to avoid this. Is there any way I can setup the Gateway to perform its routing in a smarter way ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Things to take in cosideration:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a)I do not want to chage the mtu's on any of the LAN hosts&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) I want to avoid changing Gateway's eth0 mtu to 1400.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanking you in advanced.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris P.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952834#M87352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Admin32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-16T13:57:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952835#M87353</link>
      <description>This seems strange to me that the gateway is having problems breaking down and assembling the packets.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you run ethereal on the gateway to trace the activity?  Just to confirm that the conversion is taking place.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there anything else running on the gateway that might take away CPU cycles from the network packet handling?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd want to confirm the behavior and then hammer redhat if it is not behaving as expected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What you have described should work with the gateway rebuilding the large packets, and just passing through the smaller data from the customer.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952835#M87353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Gilmore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-17T16:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952836#M87354</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Run these commands and see whether it makes any difference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#echo "1" &amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#echo "1" &amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#service network restart&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try VPN again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;U.SivaKumar&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:10:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952836#M87354</guid>
      <dc:creator>U.SivaKumar_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-18T04:10:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952837#M87355</link>
      <description>PMTU must be disabled on both sides behind the gateways. This mechanism tries to optimize the windowsize/packetsize and set the "don't fragment bit". This should be switched of if communication will be made over gateways/routers. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The other possiblity is to modify the route with a smaller packet size. You can modify this behaviour by assigning a specific packet size to the route command. So the packet size affects only this connection and not the whole adapter packet size.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952837#M87355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-25T07:22:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952838#M87356</link>
      <description>Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Our VPN is a Cisco, and we did go to 1400, when we had similar issues.  It seemed the path of least resistance. I know that it is a major pain. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We had Cisco here to set up a demonstrator, and we bought into it. Last thoing I know we did was to change MTU to 1400 from 1500.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tim</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 13:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952838#M87356</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Sanko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-05T13:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952839#M87357</link>
      <description>Wouldn't it make more sence NOT to disable the Path MTU ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This way a host or server can adjust their MTU size depending on the icmp notification they get.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952839#M87357</guid>
      <dc:creator>Admin32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-09T09:20:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952840#M87358</link>
      <description>Lowering packet size and disabling pmtu is the right choice for connections outside of a local network. The pmtu algorithm is useless if using a router. Have a look into good network books for more information.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 06:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952840#M87358</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-12T06:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with frame sizes over VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952841#M87359</link>
      <description>I have had this problem also. But i used OpenBSD as router. I fixed the problem by enabling 'scrub' in my pf filter configuration. This is a parameter to pf (packetfilter) that reorders packets and normalizes them.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm sure linux can do this too.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/problems-with-frame-sizes-over-vpn/m-p/2952841#M87359</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joost_4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-21T11:37:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

