<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about gigabit adapter in a Proliant using Linux in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888440#M89194</link>
    <description>I'm not a Linuxadministrator but takes care of our LAN and is now investigating teaming network adapters on our server (we run that on Windows already - but not our Linux boxes).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Doesn't the bcm5700 driver make it possible to team your adapters that the original driver doesn't?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jonas Back_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-04-28T06:39:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about gigabit adapter in a Proliant using Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888437#M89191</link>
      <description>I have a customer running RHAS v2.1 on a Proliant DL380 G3. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is download for an "approved" driver for the gigabit NIC that replaces the standard "tg3.o" driver with a "bcm5700.o" driver. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are having trouble getting that driver to work, but the original tg3 driver seems to work fine. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can we safely stick with that? What, if any, are the advantages of the bcm5700 driver?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-K.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888437#M89191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Joubert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-22T19:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about gigabit adapter in a Proliant using Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888438#M89192</link>
      <description>1) If the original driver works and provides Gigabit speeds, why are you tyring to change it? Is this a bug fix or what?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many will disagree with me, but if there is no compelling reason to upgrade a driver leave it alone. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Compelling reasons:&lt;BR /&gt;Security problems.&lt;BR /&gt;Performance issues.&lt;BR /&gt;Standards compliance.&lt;BR /&gt;Unexplained problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not so compelling reasons: &lt;BR /&gt;I'm bored.&lt;BR /&gt;I want to see how it works.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In those cases, I find something more productive to do.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I stay as current as possible on patches and kernel configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But, when the latest Red Hat Kernel wouldn't boot on my production server(even after testing out very nicely), I back it out and happily stayed with the old one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;P&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888438#M89192</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-22T20:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about gigabit adapter in a Proliant using Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888439#M89193</link>
      <description>I guess thats what I am asking... is there a compelling reason to change that anyone here knows of? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The documentation doesn't really speak to it, but does this driver "update" correct any of these compelling reasons you mention?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Kevin&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888439#M89193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Joubert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-22T20:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about gigabit adapter in a Proliant using Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888440#M89194</link>
      <description>I'm not a Linuxadministrator but takes care of our LAN and is now investigating teaming network adapters on our server (we run that on Windows already - but not our Linux boxes).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Doesn't the bcm5700 driver make it possible to team your adapters that the original driver doesn't?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/question-about-gigabit-adapter-in-a-proliant-using-linux/m-p/2888440#M89194</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonas Back_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-28T06:39:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

