<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RH6.1&amp;amp;7 proxy+ email in middle of NT4 NW in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666935#M89849</link>
    <description>Hi all. I recently inherited a NW position, where our DNS, Gateway, proxy, &amp;amp; E mail are tied to an HP Netserver+NT4/Dell+W2000 NW.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RH is running only in text mode, theres no SAMBA, and the only info I have besides books, is a listing of all IP addresses and the Gateway info. Linuxconfig, sendmail 8, and fetchmail3(?)are running now, and IPchains.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Linux services have 99% uptime, which is great, and I am happy to learn the system &amp;amp; issues, but if a problem arises, it is VERY difficult to administer, and can take a while too. &lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking of scraping the Linux, for a MSFT email+proxy client, and running a full new version of RH on a seperate server to learn on, then do it all up properly when I can navigate the RH file structure and debug simple issues. I think a MSFT+RH NW configured with all the necessary utilites would be great, instead of a jumble of different RH OS's running the different services mentioned.&lt;BR /&gt;(RH7.0-proxy, RH6.1&amp;amp; 6.2-DNS+Gateway+SMTP)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Does full RH graphical support make Admin. any eaier?&lt;BR /&gt;-Any suggestions?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Luke_9</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-02-18T21:09:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RH6.1&amp;7 proxy+ email in middle of NT4 NW</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666935#M89849</link>
      <description>Hi all. I recently inherited a NW position, where our DNS, Gateway, proxy, &amp;amp; E mail are tied to an HP Netserver+NT4/Dell+W2000 NW.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RH is running only in text mode, theres no SAMBA, and the only info I have besides books, is a listing of all IP addresses and the Gateway info. Linuxconfig, sendmail 8, and fetchmail3(?)are running now, and IPchains.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Linux services have 99% uptime, which is great, and I am happy to learn the system &amp;amp; issues, but if a problem arises, it is VERY difficult to administer, and can take a while too. &lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking of scraping the Linux, for a MSFT email+proxy client, and running a full new version of RH on a seperate server to learn on, then do it all up properly when I can navigate the RH file structure and debug simple issues. I think a MSFT+RH NW configured with all the necessary utilites would be great, instead of a jumble of different RH OS's running the different services mentioned.&lt;BR /&gt;(RH7.0-proxy, RH6.1&amp;amp; 6.2-DNS+Gateway+SMTP)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Does full RH graphical support make Admin. any eaier?&lt;BR /&gt;-Any suggestions?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666935#M89849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luke_9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-18T21:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RH6.1&amp;7 proxy+ email in middle of NT4 NW</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666936#M89850</link>
      <description>If I understood your description correctly, it sounds like your Linux box is the network firewall (why else run ipchains?)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You don't need (or even want) samba on a firewall box and M$FT proxy won't give you any meaningful protection for the network.  Neither am I a big fan of using X on firewalls which means no GUI interface.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By all means go ahead and bring up a new box running RH 7.2 but install it *parallel* to the existing one.  When you have a config you want to test it's much less stressful on you to have a known working fallback system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Paul</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666936#M89850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul R. Dittrich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-20T14:31:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RH6.1&amp;7 proxy+ email in middle of NT4 NW</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666937#M89851</link>
      <description>Yes, your right. Thats a good idea to keep current config as an operational backup.&lt;BR /&gt;I dont have a choice.&lt;BR /&gt;I was hoping SAMBA might enable DNS/Proxy info to be admin. or seen through WinNT, or mail &amp;amp; user accounts to be admin. through NT, but I guess not.&lt;BR /&gt;Linuxconf is helpful though, so it isnt all bad.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/rh6-1-amp-7-proxy-email-in-middle-of-nt4-nw/m-p/2666937#M89851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luke_9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-21T13:54:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

